I’m interested in learning how someone can researchReference Materials
Replay
Every recorded step of a run, as the agent saw the screen: the frame, the action it took, what it said, and which rubrics the judge's evidence had reached by then. 4 runs recorded with screenshots.
Claude Opus 5Within budget
- 88%
- Rubric score
- 19m 12s
- Recorded time
- 86
- Steps
- 7/8
- Rubrics passed
Task promptI’m interested in learning how someone can research Portuguese family history using reliable public sources rather than depending on commercial genealogy websites or unsourced family-tree pages. I want to understand which archives, civil-registration resources, parish records, digitised collections, newspapers, historical maps, and library resources can actually help with different stages of genealogical research. I’d like to compare the resources by what period and type of information they cover, whether original records or digital images can be viewed online, whether an account or payment is required, what geographic coverage they provide, how searchable they are, and whether the information should be treated as an original record, an index, a finding aid, or a secondary source. I also want to understand common research problems such as changing parish boundaries, spelling variations, incomplete digitisation, old Portuguese terminology, and records that are held by different archives. Finally, I’d like to hear from people who have researched Portuguese ancestry about practical mistakes and strategies that helped them find difficult records. Please research this in a real browser and create a ranked list with reasoning that identifies the most useful public research resources and explains when each should be used. Use publicly accessible pages that can be read without logging in, subscribing, or paying whenever possible. Prefer Portuguese government archives, national or district libraries and archives, official civil-registration services, universities, recognised historical institutions, and established genealogical organisations for factual information. Use community discussions only for practical experiences and clearly separate them from authoritative archival information. If a selected resource is inaccessible, use another qualifying public source and explain the replacement. If a requested detail is not explicitly stated, record it as "not stated." Do not invent record coverage, digitisation status, search capabilities, fees, access restrictions, or historical facts.
I’m interested in learning how someone can research Portuguese family history using reliable public sources rather than depending on commercial genealogy websites or unsourced family-tree pages. I want to understand which archives, civil-registration resources, parish records, digitised collections, newspapers, historical maps, and library resources can actually help with different stages of genealogical research. I’d like to compare the resources by what period and type of information they cover, whether original records or digital images can be viewed online, whether an account or payment is required, what geographic coverage they provide, how searchable they are, and whether the information should be treated as an original record, an index, a finding aid, or a secondary source. I also want to understand common research problems such as changing parish boundaries, spelling variations, incomplete digitisation, old Portuguese terminology, and records that are held by different archives. Finally, I’d like to hear from people who have researched Portuguese ancestry about practical mistakes and strategies that helped them find difficult records. Please research this in a real browser and create a ranked list with reasoning that identifies the most useful public research resources and explains when each should be used. Use publicly accessible pages that can be read without logging in, subscribing, or paying whenever possible. Prefer Portuguese government archives, national or district libraries and archives, official civil-registration services, universities, recognised historical institutions, and established genealogical organisations for factual information. Use community discussions only for practical experiences and clearly separate them from authoritative archival information. If a selected resource is inaccessible, use another qualifying public source and explain the replacement. If a requested detail is not explicitly stated, record it as "not stated." Do not invent record coverage, digitisation status, search capabilities, fees, access restrictions, or historical facts.