A colleague's family is formalizing their annual charitableCommunity and Society
Replay
Every recorded step of a run, as the agent saw the screen: the frame, the action it took, what it said, and which rubrics the judge's evidence had reached by then. 4 runs recorded with screenshots.
GPT-5.6 solWithin budget
- 86%
- Rubric score
- 37m 55s
- Recorded time
- 47
- Steps
- 6/7
- Rubrics passed
Task promptA colleague's family is formalizing their annual charitable giving and wants a rigorously vetted shortlist of ocean-conservation and marine-research nonprofits with a proposed $50,000 allocation across them not a list of well-known names, an actually verified one. Every candidate must be a US-registered 501(c)(3) currently in good standing, have a Charity Navigator rating of at least 3 stars, a program expense ratio above 75% (meaning at least 75 cents of every dollar goes to programs rather than overhead/fundraising), no unresolved major controversy reported in the last 2 years, and the family wants a mix one or two large, established organizations plus at least two smaller or regionally focused ones, rather than putting everything into a single big name. Start by browsing Charity Navigator's ocean/environment category (charitynavigator.org) fully viewable without an account to build an initial longlist of 15–20 candidates. For every candidate, go to ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer (projects.propublica.org/nonprofits). and pull their most recently filed Form 990 to check the program expense ratio and confirm top executive compensation isn't disproportionate to the organization's total budget (flag anything where the top salary exceeds roughly 10% of total expenses as worth a closer look). Then verify each candidate's current legal standing using the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (apps.irs.gov/app/eos), also fully public, to confirm their 501(c)(3) status hasn't been revoked and their most recent filings are up to date. Next, run a controversy check for each candidate: search their organization name plus "investigation," "controversy," or "lawsuit" and review any news coverage from the last 2 years, noting anything unresolved or unaddressed by the organization. Cross-check the Charity Navigator star rating against the organization's Candid/GuideStar Seal of Transparency level where visible on the public-facing seal badge (no login required to see the seal tier itself, even though the full report is gated). Once every candidate has been through all four checks financial ratio, legal standing, controversy, and rating narrow to a final list that satisfies the size-mix requirement (1–2 large orgs + 2+ smaller/regional orgs), and propose a tiered $50,000 allocation (for example, a larger share to the flagship organization(s) and the remainder split across the smaller ones) with a short reasoning note per organization explaining the allocation. Compile all of this into a Google Sheets tracker with tabs for "Candidate Longlist," "Financial Vetting (990 data)," "Legal Status," "Controversy Check," and "Final Shortlist & Allocation," and leave the sheet open for the family to review.
A colleague's family is formalizing their annual charitable giving and wants a rigorously vetted shortlist of ocean-conservation and marine-research nonprofits with a proposed $50,000 allocation across them not a list of well-known names, an actually verified one. Every candidate must be a US-registered 501(c)(3) currently in good standing, have a Charity Navigator rating of at least 3 stars, a program expense ratio above 75% (meaning at least 75 cents of every dollar goes to programs rather than overhead/fundraising), no unresolved major controversy reported in the last 2 years, and the family wants a mix one or two large, established organizations plus at least two smaller or regionally focused ones, rather than putting everything into a single big name. Start by browsing Charity Navigator's ocean/environment category (charitynavigator.org) fully viewable without an account to build an initial longlist of 15–20 candidates. For every candidate, go to ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer (projects.propublica.org/nonprofits). and pull their most recently filed Form 990 to check the program expense ratio and confirm top executive compensation isn't disproportionate to the organization's total budget (flag anything where the top salary exceeds roughly 10% of total expenses as worth a closer look). Then verify each candidate's current legal standing using the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (apps.irs.gov/app/eos), also fully public, to confirm their 501(c)(3) status hasn't been revoked and their most recent filings are up to date. Next, run a controversy check for each candidate: search their organization name plus "investigation," "controversy," or "lawsuit" and review any news coverage from the last 2 years, noting anything unresolved or unaddressed by the organization. Cross-check the Charity Navigator star rating against the organization's Candid/GuideStar Seal of Transparency level where visible on the public-facing seal badge (no login required to see the seal tier itself, even though the full report is gated). Once every candidate has been through all four checks financial ratio, legal standing, controversy, and rating narrow to a final list that satisfies the size-mix requirement (1–2 large orgs + 2+ smaller/regional orgs), and propose a tiered $50,000 allocation (for example, a larger share to the flagship organization(s) and the remainder split across the smaller ones) with a short reasoning note per organization explaining the allocation. Compile all of this into a Google Sheets tracker with tabs for "Candidate Longlist," "Financial Vetting (990 data)," "Legal Status," "Controversy Check," and "Final Shortlist & Allocation," and leave the sheet open for the family to review.