A homeowner wants to stop making rushed decisionsHome and Garden
Replay
Every recorded step of a run, as the agent saw the screen: the frame, the action it took, what it said, and which rubrics the judge's evidence had reached by then. 4 runs recorded with screenshots.
Claude Opus 5.5
- 100%
- Rubric score
- 17
- Steps
- 15/15
- Rubrics passed
Task promptA homeowner wants to stop making rushed decisions whenever something in the house breaks, starts performing poorly, or shows signs of damage. In the past, repairs have sometimes been approved based on a contractor's first explanation, a quick internet search, or the cheapest-looking option. The homeowner now wants a reusable system for figuring out what is actually known, what still needs to be investigated, whether a repair is appropriate, and how to compare proposed solutions before spending money. Build a practical home repair diagnosis, maintenance, and contractor-scope review system that can be reused for different household problems. The system should cover common categories such as plumbing, electrical systems, heating and cooling equipment, roofing or water intrusion, appliances, insulation, doors and windows, and general structural or finish problems. Do not provide dangerous DIY instructions for work that should be performed by qualified professionals. Instead, focus on evidence gathering, decision-making, scope verification, documentation, and escalation. Research authoritative sources such as government housing agencies, building authorities, safety regulators, recognized standards organizations, manufacturer documentation, utility guidance, and professional trade organizations. Prefer primary and authoritative sources. Clearly distinguish general maintenance principles from requirements that depend on local building codes, regulations, equipment models, or professional judgment. The final system should help someone move from “something seems wrong” to a documented decision: investigate further, perform routine maintenance, obtain professional diagnosis, repair, replace, monitor, or escalate. It should also explain how to compare contractor proposals without automatically choosing the lowest quote. Use fictional household scenarios to test difficult cases, including recurring problems, conflicting contractor opinions, incomplete information, temporary fixes that hide deeper problems, and repairs where replacement may appear easier but is not necessarily justified. The final deliverable should be a reusable written guide containing diagnostic workflows, evidence checklists, contractor-scope review methods, decision rules, scenario tests, documentation templates, and a maintenance-review process that remains useful as equipment, contractors, and household circumstances change.
A homeowner wants to stop making rushed decisions whenever something in the house breaks, starts performing poorly, or shows signs of damage. In the past, repairs have sometimes been approved based on a contractor's first explanation, a quick internet search, or the cheapest-looking option. The homeowner now wants a reusable system for figuring out what is actually known, what still needs to be investigated, whether a repair is appropriate, and how to compare proposed solutions before spending money. Build a practical home repair diagnosis, maintenance, and contractor-scope review system that can be reused for different household problems. The system should cover common categories such as plumbing, electrical systems, heating and cooling equipment, roofing or water intrusion, appliances, insulation, doors and windows, and general structural or finish problems. Do not provide dangerous DIY instructions for work that should be performed by qualified professionals. Instead, focus on evidence gathering, decision-making, scope verification, documentation, and escalation. Research authoritative sources such as government housing agencies, building authorities, safety regulators, recognized standards organizations, manufacturer documentation, utility guidance, and professional trade organizations. Prefer primary and authoritative sources. Clearly distinguish general maintenance principles from requirements that depend on local building codes, regulations, equipment models, or professional judgment. The final system should help someone move from “something seems wrong” to a documented decision: investigate further, perform routine maintenance, obtain professional diagnosis, repair, replace, monitor, or escalate. It should also explain how to compare contractor proposals without automatically choosing the lowest quote. Use fictional household scenarios to test difficult cases, including recurring problems, conflicting contractor opinions, incomplete information, temporary fixes that hide deeper problems, and repairs where replacement may appear easier but is not necessarily justified. The final deliverable should be a reusable written guide containing diagnostic workflows, evidence checklists, contractor-scope review methods, decision rules, scenario tests, documentation templates, and a maintenance-review process that remains useful as equipment, contractors, and household circumstances change.