I’m interested in understanding how local news organisationsNews & Media Publishers
Replay
Every recorded step of a run, as the agent saw the screen: the frame, the action it took, what it said, and which rubrics the judge's evidence had reached by then. 4 runs recorded with screenshots.
Claude Opus 5.5
- 100%
- Rubric score
- 87
- Steps
- 8/8
- Rubrics passed
Task promptI’m interested in understanding how local news organisations in Kenya cover major public events and how a reader can evaluate the reliability and context of that coverage without relying on a single article or social-media post. I want to compare several established Kenyan news organisations and examine how they present breaking news, follow-up reporting, official statements, eyewitness accounts, corrections, background information, and opinion. I also want to understand the difference between a reported fact, an attributed claim, an analysis, an editorial, and an unverified statement, particularly when stories are developing quickly. I’d like to examine how the same public event can be reported differently by multiple outlets and learn a practical method for checking important claims against primary or official sources. Finally, I want to hear from Kenyan readers and media discussions about practical experiences with corrections, sensational headlines, paywalls or inaccessible articles, social-media reposts, and difficulties distinguishing reporting from commentary. Please research this in a real browser and create a practical news-verification and source-comparison guide. Use publicly accessible pages that can be read without logging in, subscribing, or paying. Prefer Kenyan news organisations, official government and public-institution sources, recognised journalism organisations, universities, media regulators, and established media-literacy organisations for factual information. Use community discussions only for practical experiences and clearly separate them from verified reporting. If a selected source is inaccessible, use another qualifying public source and explain the replacement. If a requested detail is not explicitly stated, record it as "not stated." Do not invent facts about a news organisation's accuracy, political position, ownership, corrections record, audience size, or editorial standards.
I’m interested in understanding how local news organisations in Kenya cover major public events and how a reader can evaluate the reliability and context of that coverage without relying on a single article or social-media post. I want to compare several established Kenyan news organisations and examine how they present breaking news, follow-up reporting, official statements, eyewitness accounts, corrections, background information, and opinion. I also want to understand the difference between a reported fact, an attributed claim, an analysis, an editorial, and an unverified statement, particularly when stories are developing quickly. I’d like to examine how the same public event can be reported differently by multiple outlets and learn a practical method for checking important claims against primary or official sources. Finally, I want to hear from Kenyan readers and media discussions about practical experiences with corrections, sensational headlines, paywalls or inaccessible articles, social-media reposts, and difficulties distinguishing reporting from commentary. Please research this in a real browser and create a practical news-verification and source-comparison guide. Use publicly accessible pages that can be read without logging in, subscribing, or paying. Prefer Kenyan news organisations, official government and public-institution sources, recognised journalism organisations, universities, media regulators, and established media-literacy organisations for factual information. Use community discussions only for practical experiences and clearly separate them from verified reporting. If a selected source is inaccessible, use another qualifying public source and explain the replacement. If a requested detail is not explicitly stated, record it as "not stated." Do not invent facts about a news organisation's accuracy, political position, ownership, corrections record, audience size, or editorial standards.