CompanyBench

Global Rankings

Every model attempts every task 10 times independently under identical conditions, and every trial is graded check by check — exact values against expert-computed golds, database state for write-actions, tool-trace checks for process. The board ranks on full task passes: a trial counts only when it cleared every check on the task, and a model's figure is the share of its trials that did. Nothing here is partial credit — a trial that is right about most of a fee-revenue reconstruction and wrong about the total counts exactly as a trial that got none of it. Ranked across 4 models.

Last updated 2026-06-15

Model Scorecard · open a row for its model cardall-core pass rateTool Calls
  1. 1GPT-5.544.4%640 trials63

    Model card · evaluated Jun 2026

    640 trials

    • All-core pass

      44.4%

    Failure Modes

    Every verifier failure was reviewed and filed under one failure mode, grouped into the stages above. The shares split this model's own 356 verifier failures, worst first — grader error is excluded, so a model is never charged with its grader's mistake.

    Pass rate by taxonomy subdomain

    1. Payments & Transfers56%
    2. Deposits & Funding55%
    3. Risk & Fraud50.8%
    4. Subscriptions & Billing47.5%
    5. Compliance & Regulatory44.3%
    6. Cards & Interchange43.3%
    7. Customer & Account Analytics40%
    8. Revenue & Fees33.3%
    9. Reconciliation & Settlement23.3%

    The share of each subdomain’s verifiers this model’s trials cleared, its tasks’ trials added together.

  2. 2Claude Opus 4.835.9%640 trials31

    Model card · evaluated Jun 2026

    640 trials

    • All-core pass

      35.9%

    Failure Modes

    Every verifier failure was reviewed and filed under one failure mode, grouped into the stages above. The shares split this model's own 410 verifier failures, worst first — grader error is excluded, so a model is never charged with its grader's mistake.

    Pass rate by taxonomy subdomain

    1. Cards & Interchange52.5%
    2. Payments & Transfers43%
    3. Risk & Fraud35.8%
    4. Customer & Account Analytics34%
    5. Reconciliation & Settlement30%
    6. Subscriptions & Billing27.5%
    7. Compliance & Regulatory25.7%
    8. Revenue & Fees25%
    9. Deposits & Funding10%

    The share of each subdomain’s verifiers this model’s trials cleared, its tasks’ trials added together.

  3. 3Gemini 3.1 Pro18.3%640 trials46

    Model card · evaluated Jun 2026

    640 trials

    • All-core pass

      18.3%

    Failure Modes

    Every verifier failure was reviewed and filed under one failure mode, grouped into the stages above. The shares split this model's own 523 verifier failures, worst first — grader error is excluded, so a model is never charged with its grader's mistake.

    Pass rate by taxonomy subdomain

    1. Subscriptions & Billing42.5%
    2. Compliance & Regulatory24.3%
    3. Cards & Interchange24.2%
    4. Payments & Transfers22%
    5. Revenue & Fees18.3%
    6. Risk & Fraud14.2%
    7. Reconciliation & Settlement5%
    8. Customer & Account Analytics2%
    9. Deposits & Funding0%

    The share of each subdomain’s verifiers this model’s trials cleared, its tasks’ trials added together.

  4. 4Gemini 3.5 Flash7.7%640 trials54

    Model card · evaluated Jun 2026

    640 trials

    • All-core pass

      7.7%

    Failure Modes

    Every verifier failure was reviewed and filed under one failure mode, grouped into the stages above. The shares split this model's own 591 verifier failures, worst first — grader error is excluded, so a model is never charged with its grader's mistake.

    Pass rate by taxonomy subdomain

    1. Subscriptions & Billing25%
    2. Risk & Fraud22.5%
    3. Revenue & Fees5%
    4. Reconciliation & Settlement3.3%
    5. Compliance & Regulatory2.9%
    6. Cards & Interchange2.5%
    7. Payments & Transfers2%
    8. Customer & Account Analytics0%
    9. Deposits & Funding0%

    The share of each subdomain’s verifiers this model’s trials cleared, its tasks’ trials added together.

Benchmark Scope

What this set covers. Each task is filed under exactly one of the bench's nine operational categories, so the bars count tasks. Payments and risk dominate the corpus; the Taxonomy tab lists every category with its tasks.

Task Domain & Sub-domain Coverage

How the task set distributes across industry domains, each domain headed by its total with the specific processes under it

Cards & Interchange
12 of 64 tasks
Risk & Fraud
12 of 64 tasks
Payments & Transfers
10 of 64 tasks
Compliance & Regulatory
7 of 64 tasks
Reconciliation & Settlement
6 of 64 tasks
Revenue & Fees
6 of 64 tasks
Customer & Account Analytics
5 of 64 tasks
Subscriptions & Billing
4 of 64 tasks
Deposits & Funding
2 of 64 tasks

Aggregate Metrics

All-Core Pass Rate

Percentage of trials that cleared every check on the task, averaged across tasks

  1. 44.4%

    GPT-5.5

  2. 35.9%

    Claude Opus 4.8

  3. 18.3%

    Gemini 3.1 Pro

  4. 7.7%

    Gemini 3.5 Flash

Category Difficulty

The board's order is not the order in every category. Read a column and you find models trading places between reconciliation work and cross-system coordination; a row that is uniformly dark is a category nobody has cracked. Each cell is the share of a model's trials on that category's tasks that cleared every check — the same reading as the board above, one category at a time.

All-Core Pass Rate — Taxonomy × Model

Share of trials that cleared every check on the task, per top-level taxonomy domain — a domain is its tasks' trials re-added, weighted as the evaluation ran them. Colour bands the value; every cell also prints it.

GPT-5.5
Claude Opus 4.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Reconciliation & Settlement
23.3%
30%
5%
3.3%
Deposits & Funding
55%
10%
0%
0%
Customer & Account Analytics
40%
34%
2%
0%
Revenue & Fees
33.3%
25%
18.3%
5%
Compliance & Regulatory
44.3%
25.7%
24.3%
2.9%
Cards & Interchange
43.3%
52.5%
24.2%
2.5%
Payments & Transfers
56%
43%
22%
2%
Risk & Fraud
50.8%
35.8%
14.2%
22.5%
Subscriptions & Billing
47.5%
27.5%
42.5%
25%
Domains at or above the mean
9/9
7/9
2/9
0/9

0%56%

Economics

What the trials spent, in the units this drop actually measures: tool calls against the connected systems, and the length of the published agent traces. Cost, token and time charts light up the day the producer ships the trial-level metrics CSV they hold upstream.

Avg Tool Calls

Tool invocations, averaged across trials and all tasks

  1. 63

    GPT-5.5

  2. 54

    Gemini 3.5 Flash

  3. 46

    Gemini 3.1 Pro

  4. 31

    Claude Opus 4.8

Avg Trajectory Steps

Agent-loop steps — every event, not only tool calls — averaged across trials and all tasks, counted from the full trajectories before truncation

  1. 56

    Gemini 3.5 Flash

  2. 45

    Gemini 3.1 Pro

  3. 36

    GPT-5.5

  4. 20

    Claude Opus 4.8