EKWbench
Switch benchEKWbench
Request dataset samplesby

task_111Manufacturing

16 verifiers · 15 core · 1 secondary · 16 LLM-graded

TaxonomyManufacturingBuyers and purchasing agents

All trialsGPT-5.6 TerracodexTrial 03

81%

Trial reward

GPT-5.6 TerraFail

Trial 03 — 2nd of 4 by reward score. This model averages 82.5% across 4 trials on this task.

  • 12/15Core verifiers passed
  • 13/16All verifiers passed
  • 3Core failed
  • 42Turns
  • 29Tool calls
  • $1.68Cost
  • 26.3mTime
  • 70kOutput tokens

Missed 3 of 15 core — traceability, escalation_language and memo_recommendation.

core (15)

  • usable_quantityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Coverage must be assessed on usable yield-adjusted quantity net of allocations, and the original attempt's central risk is treating gross or physically-present pounds as usable.

    How to pass

    Checks that the analysis workbook reports usable on-hand quantity using the formula (On Hand - Allocated) x Yield Factor for inventory lots rather than gross on-hand pounds.

    Reads

  • country_of_originLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Country-of-origin restrictions are binding contractual constraints, and the cheapest/fastest options for several critical lines are non-qualifying-origin material that must not be selected.

    How to pass

    Checks that material melted in China or Russia is excluded for the DFARS programs (Raven, Sable) and the CUST-EU programs (Meridian, Tundra) regardless of price or certificate quality.

    Reads

  • cert_traceabilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    EN 10204 3.1/3.2 certification and full traceability are minimum eligibility gates, and the original attempt risks accepting C-of-C or non-traceable material that is physically attractive.

    How to pass

    Checks that Certificate-of-Conformance-only lots/quotes and partial-traceability lots are excluded from certified-production coverage.

    Reads

  • source_hold_statusLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Approved-source status and hold status are hard eligibility gates, and otherwise-attractive USA-origin material from these sources must not be planned against requirements.

    How to pass

    Checks that sources in Suspended, Conditional, or Not Approved status, and material under an open quality/MRB or receiving-inspection hold, are excluded from new commitments.

    Reads

  • substitution_policyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The substitution policy is exhaustive and prohibits interchange (e.g., T651 vs T7351, /11 vs /12, bar vs plate vs extrusion), so a model must not silently treat near-match material as covering a callout.

    How to pass

    Checks that no alloy, temper/condition, product-form, or specification sub-spec substitution is applied beyond same-spec oversize/remnant cutdown.

    Reads

  • allocation_priorityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Program-priority allocation is an explicit contention rule, and getting it wrong misassigns scarce compliant stock between competing programs.

    How to pass

    Checks that contested inventory lots usable by more than one requirement are allocated to the higher-priority (lower rank number) program first, with lower-priority shortfalls flowing to new purchase.

    Reads

  • lead_time_feasibilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Lead-time feasibility is an explicit gate, and the original attempt risks counting a compliant quote that docks on or after need-by as resolving a requirement on schedule.

    How to pass

    Checks that a supplier quote is treated as feasible only when its quoted dock/receipt date precedes the requirement need-by date.

    Reads

  • requirement_coverageLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level coverage classification is the core analytical output the task asks for and must be complete across all demand lines.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook classifies each of the 26 requirements into a coverage disposition (covered from compliant inventory, partial inventory plus buy, or full new purchase) at the requirement-ID level.

    Reads

  • traceabilityLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level traceability is an explicit auditability obligation and is exactly where a weaker solution omits the why-rejected evidence chain.

    How to pass

    Checks that for each at-risk requirement the workbook records the selected inventory lot(s) with usable quantity, the rejected lots with reasons, the selected quote, the rejected quote alternatives with reasons, the residual after inventory, and the resulting purchase quantity and cost.

    Reads

    Failure mode Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or Incomplete

    Why it failed

    Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.

    Justification

    The workbook does not provide a single per-requirement view for at-risk lines that combines all required elements. Selected/rejected lots with reasons are in "Inv-Req Match," selected/rejected quotes with reasons are in "Quote-Req Match," quantities are in "Requirements"/"Allocations," and cost is in quote-level "Recommended PO." For shared quotes such as QTE-A3F91C (supporting REQ-H4A2 and REQ-B6N3), cost is not shown per requirement, so the required requirement-level audit trail is not fully satisfied.

  • residual_vs_moqLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Conflating need with MOQ-inflated buy quantity was a defect in the earlier attempt and obscures both true demand and committed spend.

    How to pass

    Checks that requirement residual quantity is reported separately from the minimum-order-quantity-adjusted purchase quantity, with the excess identified.

    Reads

  • cost_reconciliationLLMPass
    Why it matters

    A reconciled, self-consistent committed total was an explicit fix from the earlier attempt, where the memo and PO tab disagreed on the headline figure and shared lines risked double-charging.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook presents a single authoritative total committed new-buy cost with no conflicting totals and a cost chain that reconciles, with shared quote lines not double-counted.

    Reads

  • escalation_languageLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Clarifying escalation language so that 'every requirement has a feasible path' is not conflated with quality holds awaiting action was an explicit obligation from the earlier revision.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo states there is no hard sourcing dead-end while separately listing quality/MRB/process escalations.

    Reads

    Failure mode Escalation or Tradeoff Communication Incomplete

    Why it failed

    The memo never cleanly pairs the required no-hard-sourcing-dead-end assertion with a separately listed set of quality or process escalations, either because a genuine shortfall remains unstated as such or because the two kinds of issue are conflated.

    Justification

    The memo does separate blocked lots/quality holds from the sourcing plan (e.g., LOT-B3E7C0 and LOT-8F4D17 are explicitly excluded and 'the sourcing plan is not dependent on their release'), but it does not clearly state that every requirement has a confirmed schedule-feasible path. REQ-L8Q4 is flagged as a 'schedule-risk escalation' and 'Release only with PMO/Quality timing verification' because the quote docks only 2 days before need-by, so the no-hard-dead-end/schedule-feasible criterion is not fully satisfied.

  • memo_recommendationLLMFail
    Why it matters

    The task's core decision principle is distinguishing usable material from merely cheap/fast/available material, and the memo is where that reasoning must be made legible to leadership.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo recommends a sourcing/allocation plan that prioritizes compliance over lowest price or shortest lead time and explicitly identifies rejected cheaper/faster non-compliant options.

    Reads

    Failure mode Escalation or Tradeoff Communication Incomplete

    Why it failed

    The memo argues compliance over price or lead time but omits naming at least one of the three required attractive, cheaper, or faster non-compliant quotes along with the specific reason it was rejected.

    Justification

    The memo does recommend compliant sourcing over cost/lead time (e.g., “Price was compared only after compliance and timing”) and explicitly rejects the China-melt 7075-T7351 option at $6.85/lb (QTE-7D2B40) and a C-of-C-only 4340 option (QTE-B6D2A9) as unusable. However, it does not explicitly name the required lowest-price Russia-melt 15-5PH quote (~$8.10/lb) with its specific rejection reason; it only refers generically to “lower-priced Russia and conditional-source alternatives.” Since the rubric requires all listed attractive-but-rejected options to be documented, this fails.

  • no_fabrication_side_effectsLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The task forbids inventing options beyond the source packet, and penalizing fabricated content or unrequested side-additions protects against hallucinated uplift that would look like a stronger answer.

    How to pass

    Checks that the deliverables do not introduce fabricated alloys, tempers, substitutions, approvals, waivers, expedite options, or other material not present in the source files, and do not add materially unsolicited deliverables.

    Reads

  • residual_po_reconciliationLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The shared-PO double-counting failure mode (inflating the committed total by billing one quote line at each requirement's minimum) is exactly where the earlier attempt produced an unreconciled headline figure, and catching it is a fair, materially distinct core check.

    How to pass

    Checks that the sum of per-requirement residual purchase needs reconciles to the consolidated purchase-order quantities and committed cost, so shared quote lines are not double-counted across the requirements they serve.

    Reads

secondary (1)

  • memo_consistencyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    If the memo asserts headline counts or program restriction classes, they must be accurate and self-consistent; this guards against a confidently-stated but wrong summary rather than mandating an unprompted structure.

    How to pass

    Checks that any coverage counts or per-program restriction classes the memo chooses to state are internally consistent and correct, without forcing the memo to include specific counts.

    Reads

2 deliverables · what this trial produced

material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx101 KB

Summary24 rows

Material Sourcing Analysis Workbook
2026 Q3 Door / Hinge Mechanism Build Wave — planning basis is the controlled source packet dated 2026-06-19. Blue = sourced inputs / decisions; green = cross-sheet links; black = formulas.
Decision Summary
MetricValueInterpretation
Forecast requirements26Requirement count from material demand forecast.
Fully covered requirements26Coverage must be compliant inventory and/or feasible compliant quote.
Total required usable quantity (lb)8960Net required usable pounds.
Planned compliant inventory allocation (lb)5857.25After existing allocations and documented yield.
Planned compliant quote coverage (lb)3102.75Residual demand covered by recommended quotes.
Planning spend at stated unit price / minimum-order basis32948.22Uses MAX(allocated coverage, stated minimum order); buyer must not assume a partial release beyond documented terms.
Full offered-line cost exposure49310Source quote extended costs if all offered quantities are required.
Open schedule-risk requirement(s)1QTE-6D1B84 docks only two days before Sable need-by.
Program Coverage by Priority
ProgramPriorityRestrictionRequired Usable (lb)Inventory Plan (lb)Quote Plan (lb)Total Plan (lb)Status
PRG-RAVEN1DFARS20271525.6501.42027Covered
PRG-SABLE2DFARS1218339.2878.81218Covered
PRG-MERIDIAN3CUST-EU16281252.7375.31628Covered
PRG-TUNDRA4CUST-EU13097395701309Covered
PRG-HALCYON5None16601201.5458.51660Covered
PRG-CALDER6None1118799.25318.751118Covered
Leadership Direction
Reserve inventory in priority order exactly as shown in Allocations; do not draw lower-priority material before higher-priority commitments are protected.
Release the 12 Recommended PO lines before their stated quote expiries. The plan covers all 26 requirements, but quote expiry and full-line versus minimum-order commercial terms must be reconfirmed by Procurement.
Do not allocate physically present lots or quotes marked Blocked in the matching tabs. Certificate, traceability, source approval, open hold, origin, and timing gates take precedence over price or physical availability.
Escalate REQ-L8Q4 (Sable 4340 plate): the only compliant path docks two calendar days before need-by; the packet does not document the required inspection/processing margin.

User prompt → 42 turns · 29 tool calls → final responsecodex

  1. 1systemskills instructions · Skills A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of s…

    skills instructions

    Skills

    A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and source locator. file locators are on the host filesystem, executor package locators are owned by their execution environment, orchestrator package locators are opaque package identifiers, and custom resource locators use their provider's access mechanism.

    Available skills

    • imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)
    • openai-docs: Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)
    • plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required .codex-plugin/plugin.json, optional plugin folders/files, valid manifest defaults, and personal-marketplace entries by default. Use when Codex needs to create a new personal plugin, add optional plugin structure, generate or update marketplace entries for plugi

    … 3,403 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  2. 2systemYou are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals. At the start of your tur…

    You are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals.

    At the start of your turn, you are the active agent.
    You can spawn sub-agents to handle subtasks, and those sub-agents can spawn their own sub-agents.
    All agents in the team, including the agents that you can assign tasks to, are equally intelligent and capable, and have access to the same set of tools.

    You can use spawn_agent to create a new agent, followup_task to give an existing agent a new task and trigger a turn, and send_message to pass a message to a running agent without triggering a turn.
    Child agents can also spawn their own sub-agents.
    You can decide how much context you want to propagate to your sub-agents with the fork_turns parameter.

    You will receive messages in the analysis channel in the form:

    Message Type: MESSAGE | FINAL_ANSWER
Task name: <recipient>
Sender: <author>
Payload:
<payload text>

    They may be addressed as to=/root

    Note that collaboration tools cannot be called from inside functions.exec. Call spawn_agent, send_message, followup_task, wait_agent, interrupt_agent, and list_agents only as direct tool calls using the recipient shown in their tool definitions, such as to=functions.collaboration.spawn_agent, since they are intentionally absent from the functions.exec tools.* namespace. Available tools in functions.exec are explicitly described with a tools namespace in the developer message.

    All agents share the same directory. In detail:

    • All agents have access to the same container and filesystem as you.
    • All agents use the same current working directory.
    • As a result, edits made by one agent are immediately visible to all other agents.

    When calling wait_agent, prefer longer waits (minutes) to avoid busy polling.

    There are 4 available concurrency slots, meaning that up to 4 agents can be active at once, including you.

    Full-history forks (fork_turns omitted or "all") inherit the parent mod

    … 264 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  3. 3systemmulti agent mode · Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub…

    multi agent mode

    Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub-agents unless the user or applicable AGENTS.md/skill instructions explicitly ask for sub-agents, delegation, or parallel agent work.

  4. 4userenvironment context · /workspace bash 2026-08-21 Etc/UTC /workspace

    environment context

    cwd
    /workspace
    shell
    bash
    current date
    2026-08-21
    timezone
    Etc/UTC
    root
    /workspace
  5. 5userYou are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hi…

    You are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hinge mechanism assemblies. Upcoming production lots require aluminum and steel raw materials, including plate, bar, extrusion, and machined-stock inputs. Several material requirements are at risk because available inventory, supplier quotes, lead times, certification status, source approvals, allocations, yield loss, and program priorities do not all align. Production and sourcing leadership need a sourcing plan that identifies which material lots can be used, which supplier quotes should be acted on, which requirements remain at risk, and which program commitments should be prioritized. The objective is not simply to buy the cheapest or fastest available material; the recommendation must distinguish physically available material from material that is actually usable for certified aerospace production. Using the attached material sourcing packet, determine the recommended sourcing and allocation plan for the current review cycle. Identify which aluminum and steel requirements can be covered from compliant on-hand inventory, which require new purchases, which supplier quotes are feasible, and which shortages or compliance issues require escalation. Evaluate the tradeoffs among material specification, temper or condition, product form, mill certification, traceability, approved-source status, country-of-origin or customer restrictions, available quantity after allocation, usable yield, lead time, cost, and program delivery impact. Work only from the attached materials: the material demand forecast, inventory lot and certification snapshot, approved material source list, supplier quote and lead-time matrix, engineering material substitution policy, and program priority / build schedule. Do not invent alternate alloys, tempers, substitutions, engineering approvals, customer waivers, supplier capacity, expedite options, certification corrections, yield a

    … 1,544 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  6. 6I’ll review the provided sourcing packet against the documented compliance rules, then create a decision-ready memo and…

    I’ll review the provided sourcing packet against the documented compliance rules, then create a decision-ready memo and a traceable supporting workbook. I’m using the document and spreadsheet skills because the required deliverables are .docx and .xlsx files.

  7. 7Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec20k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '1,240p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '1,260p' /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"rg --files -g '!output/**' -g '!node_modules/**' /workspace","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000})
]);
text(results.map((r,i)=>`--- RESULT

    … 44 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.2 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---
---
name: docx
description: "Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation."
license: Proprietary. LICENSE.

    … 18,690 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  8. 8The packet includes a PDF policy, so I’m also applying the PDF workflow to extract its governing substitution constraint…

    The packet includes a PDF policy, so I’m also applying the PDF workflow to extract its governing substitution constraints before making any allocation recommendation.

  9. 9Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec20k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"wc -l /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md && sed -n '241,520p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md && sed -n '261,620p' /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md && sed -n '1,420p' /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":60000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"find /workspace -maxdepth 2 -type f -printf '%p\\n' | sort","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_to

    … 101 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---
  590 /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md
  291 /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md
  314 /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md
 1195 total
new Paragraph({ children: [new PageBreak()] })

// Or use pageBreakBefore
new Paragraph({ pageBreakBefore: true, children: [new TextRun("New page")] })
```

### Hyperlinks

```javascript
// External link
new Paragraph({
  children: [new ExternalHyperlink({
    children: [new TextRun({ text: "Click here", style: "Hyperlink" })],
    link: "https://example.com",
  })]
})

// Internal link (bookmark + reference)
// 1. Create bookmark at destination
new Paragraph({ heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1, children: [
  new Bookmark({ id: "chapter1", children: [new TextRun("Chapter 1")] }),
]})
// 2. Link to it
new Paragraph({ children: [new InternalHyperlink({
  children: [new TextRun({ text: "See Chapte

    … 19,105 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  10. 10Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec2k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '521,700p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":20000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"mkdir -p /workspace/analysis && pdftotext -layout /workspace/data/engineering_material_substitution_policy.pdf /workspace/analysis/substitution_policy.txt && pandoc --track-changes=all /workspace/data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx -t plain -o /workspace/analysis/program_schedule.txt && wc -l /workspace/analysis/substitution_policy.txt /worksp

    … 1,096 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.2 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---
```xml
<w:del w:author="Jane" w:id="5">
  <w:r><w:delText>deleted text</w:delText></w:r>
</w:del>
<w:ins w:author="Claude" w:id="10">
  <w:r><w:t>deleted text</w:t></w:r>
</w:ins>
```

### Comments

After running `comment.py` (see Step 2), add markers to document.xml. For replies, use `--parent` flag and nest markers inside the parent's.

**CRITICAL: `<w:commentRangeStart>` and `<w:commentRangeEnd>` are siblings of `<w:r>`, never inside `<w:r>`.**

```xml
<!-- Comment markers are direct children of w:p, never inside w:r -->
<w:commentRangeStart w:id="0"/>
<w:del w:id="1" w:author="Claude" w:date="2025-01-01T00:00:00Z">
  <w:r><w:delText>deleted</w:delText></w:r>
</w:del>
<w:r><w:t> more text</w:t></w:r>
<w:commentRangeEnd w:id="0"/>
<w:r><w:rPr><w:rStyle w:val="CommentReference"/></w:rPr><w:commentReference w:id="0"/></w:r>

    … 1,432 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  11. 11The source schedule’s text converter is unavailable, so I’m using the packet’s native document structure instead. The su…

    The source schedule’s text converter is unavailable, so I’m using the packet’s native document structure instead. The substitution-policy extraction succeeded; I’ll reconcile it with the schedule and four data workbooks next.

  12. 12Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec34k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '1,360p' /workspace/analysis/substitution_policy.txt && printf '\\n--- PDF METADATA / PAGE COUNT ---\\n' && pdfinfo /workspace/data/engineering_material_substitution_policy.pdf | sed -n '1,80p'","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":40000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom docx import Document\np='/workspace/data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx'\nd=Document(p)\nprint('PARAGRAPHS')\nfor i,x in enumerate(d.paragraphs,1):\n    if x.text.st

    … 1,372 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.7 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---
ENGINEERING MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION POLICY                                                               ENG-MSP-Rev H | Controlled Copy




 Engineering Material Substitution Policy
 Document ENG-MSP, Revision H • Effective 2026-05-15 • Supersedes Rev G (2025-09-02)
 Approval authority: M. Caldera, Chief Engineer (Materials & Process); co-signed K. Brennan, Director of Quality. Applicability: all
 certified door and hinge mechanism assemblies sourced under the 2026 build wave.



 1. Purpose and Authority
 This policy defines the only material substitutions that may be applied to released engineering material callouts
 without a separate, document-controlled deviation. A material lot or supplier quote may be treated as covering a
 requirement only when the alloy, specification, temper or condition, and product form either match the callo

    … 32,939 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  13. 13I’ve reconciled the source rules and am now validating every lot and quote against the exact callout, certificate/tracea…

    I’ve reconciled the source rules and am now validating every lot and quote against the exact callout, certificate/traceability, source status, origin restriction, and date. The initial result is that compliant inventory covers substantial demand, but priority-driven sharing creates several purchase residuals rather than allowing unrestricted use of physically present stock.

  14. 14Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec5k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nimport pandas as pd\nfrom pathlib import Path\nroot=Path('/workspace/data')\nreq=pd.read_excel(root/'material_demand_forecast.xlsx',sheet_name='Demand Forecast')\ninv=pd.read_excel(root/'inventory_lot_cert_snapshot.xlsx',sheet_name='Lot Snapshot')\nsrc=pd.read_excel(root/'approved_material_source_list.xlsx',sheet_name='Source List')\nq=pd.read_excel(root/'supplier_quote_leadtime_matrix.xlsx',sheet_name='Quote Matrix')\nprograms={\n'PRG-RAVEN':(1,'DFARS'),'PRG-SABLE':(2,'DFARS'),'PRG-MERIDIA

    … 4,474 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.4 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---
REQ-H4A2 PRG-RAVEN 7075 AMS-QQ-A-250/12 T7351 Plate req=842: eligible=LOT-7F3A2B:516.60 | blocked=LOT-5C9A16 736.00 (DFARS origin)
REQ-K9P1 PRG-RAVEN 4340 AMS 6415 Annealed Bar req=615: eligible=LOT-3E8C71:416.00, LOT-9A4F37:244.00 | blocked=LOT-D6B821 592.80 (cert)
REQ-C9T1 PRG-RAVEN 300M AMS 6419 Annealed Bar req=176: eligible= | blocked=LOT-2B7E54 214.60 (DFARS origin)
REQ-X5M3 PRG-RAVEN 15-5PH AMS 5862 Cond A Plate req=394: eligible=LOT-6B2F39:500.20 | blocked=LOT-B3E7C0 979.40 (hold); LOT-1D6B43 664.00 (source Not Approved; DFARS origin); LOT-4D1A95 437.40 (source Conditional)
REQ-T2C7 PRG-SABLE 15-5PH AMS 5862 Cond A Plate req=430: eligible=LOT-6B2F39:500.20 | blocked=LOT-B3E7C0 979.40 (hold); LOT-1D6B43 664.00 (source Not Approved; DFARS origin); LOT-4D1A95 437.40 (source Conditional)
REQ-B6N3 PRG-SABLE 7075 AMS-QQ-A-250/12 T7351 Plate req

    … 4,443 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  15. 15The compliance screen is complete. I found one additional supplier issue: a quoted 6061 bar source is not approved for A…

    The compliance screen is complete. I found one additional supplier issue: a quoted 6061 bar source is not approved for AMS 4117 despite quoting it, so it is excluded. I’ll now build the workbook with the complete lot/quote audit trail and the recommended allocations.

  16. 16Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"npm install -g docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nallocs = {\n'LOT-7F3A2B':516.6,'LOT-3E8C71':416,'LOT-9A4F37':244,'LOT-6B2F39':500.2,'LOT-7E1C95':237.8,'LOT-A1E9F4':512,'LOT-5B2E88':323.9,'LOT-2C9E14':586.5,'LOT-8D4B19':388.85,'LOT-2E6B95':335.4,'LOT-6F2A87':289,'LOT-3A7C82':726,'LOT-9C5F28':301,'LOT-E8C520':333,'LOT-C7A340':147}\nprint('Planned inventory allocation (lb):',sum(allocs.values()))\nquote=[('QTE-

    … 976 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.6 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---

added 22 packages in 2s

1 package is looking for funding
  run `npm fund` for details

--- RESULT 2 ---
Planned inventory allocation (lb): 5857.25
Quote allocations: 3102.7499999999995
Minimum-quantity planning spend: 32948.22
Full offered-line spend: 49310
QTE-A3F91C allocation= 593.4 minPO= 593.4 indicative= 5577.96 quoteqty= 600 full= 5640
QTE-8B3F19 allocation= 176 minPO= 176 indicative= 2499.2 quoteqty= 250 full= 3550
QTE-3A9F18 allocation= 680.8 minPO= 680.8 indicative= 7999.4 quoteqty= 900 full= 10575
QTE-6D1B84 allocation= 287 minPO= 287 indicative= 1980.3 quoteqty= 450 full= 3105
QTE-2D7C64 allocation= 236.1 minPO= 236.1 indicative= 1794.36 quoteqty= 400 full= 3040
QTE-2F8C41 allocation= 198 minPO= 198 indicative= 1950.3 quoteqty= 300 full= 2955
QTE-1A6E38 allocation= 154.2 minPO= 154.2 indicative= 886.65 quoteqty= 300 full

    … 429 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  17. 17exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py\n+from pathlib import Path\n+from datetime import datetime\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+\n+import pandas as pd\n+from docx import Document\n+from openpyxl import Workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import CellIsRule, FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+from openpyxl.worksheet.table import Table, TableStyleInfo\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path('/w

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py\n+from pathlib import Path\n+from datetime import datetime\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+\n+import pandas as pd\n+from docx import Document\n+from openpyxl import Workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import CellIsRule, FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+from openpyxl.worksheet.table import Table, TableStyleInfo\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path('/w

    … 62,988 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  18. 18Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":60000});
text(result.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 4.0 seconds
Output:

/workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py:191: UserWarning: Could not infer format, so each element will be parsed individually, falling back to `dateutil`. To ensure parsing is consistent and as-expected, please specify a format.
  frame[field] = pd.to_datetime(frame[field], errors='coerce')
/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
  19. 19Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx 60","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":60000});
text(result.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 5.0 seconds
Output:

status: success
total_errors: 0
error_summary: {}
total_formulas: 2697
  20. 20Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec25k chars

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwb=load_workbook(p,data_only=True)\nfor s in ['Summary','Requirements','Recommended PO','Risks & Escalations']:\n    ws=wb[s]\n    print('\\n---',s,'---')\n    maxrow=min(ws.max_row,40)\n    for r in ws.iter_rows(min_row=1,max_row=maxrow,values_only=True):\n        vals=['' if x is None else x for x in r]\n        if any(vals): print(vals[:20])\nprint('\\nCoverage statuses:')\nws=wb['Requirements']\nfo

    … 396 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.2 seconds
Output:


--- Summary ---
['Material Sourcing Analysis Workbook', '', '', '', '', '', '', '']
['2026 Q3 Door / Hinge Mechanism Build Wave — planning basis is the controlled source packet dated 2026-06-19. Blue = sourced inputs / decisions; green = cross-sheet links; black = formulas.', '', '', '', '', '', '', '']
['Decision Summary', '', '', '', '', '', '', '']
['Metric', 'Value', 'Interpretation', '', '', '', '', '']
['Forecast requirements', 26, 'Requirement count from material demand forecast.', '', '', '', '', '']
['Fully covered requirements', 26, 'Coverage must be compliant inventory and/or feasible compliant quote.', '', '', '', '', '']
['Total required usable quantity (lb)', 8960, 'Net required usable pounds.', '', '', '', '', '']
['Planned compliant inventory allocation (lb)', 5857.25, 'After existing allocations and documented yield.', '', '', '', '', '']
['

    … 23,796 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  21. 21Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec5k chars

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwb=load_workbook(p,data_only=True)\nfor s in ['Inventory Lots','Inv-Req Match','Quote-Req Match']:\n    ws=wb[s]\n    print('\\n--',s,'--')\n    if s=='Inventory Lots':\n       for r in range(4,28): print(ws.cell(r,1).value,ws.cell(r,12).value,ws.cell(r,20).value,ws.cell(r,21).value,ws.cell(r,22).value,ws.cell(r,23).value)\n    elif s=='Inv-Req Match':\n       vals={'Eligible':0,'Blocked':0}\n       for r

    … 635 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.3 seconds
Output:


-- Inventory Lots --
LOT-C7A340 252 147 105 Base eligible REQ-W9A3 147.00 lb
LOT-3E8C71 416 416 0 Base eligible REQ-K9P1 416.00 lb
LOT-8D4B19 388.85 388.85 0 Base eligible REQ-J5G7 388.85 lb
LOT-2C9E14 586.5 586.5 0 Base eligible REQ-R7W2 412.00 lb; REQ-S6P3 174.50 lb
LOT-3A7C82 765.6 726 39.6 Base eligible REQ-Q8L5 726.00 lb
LOT-7F3A2B 516.6 516.6 0 Base eligible REQ-H4A2 516.60 lb
LOT-A1E9F4 591.6 512 79.6 Base eligible REQ-M1X8 512.00 lb
LOT-D6B821 592.8 0 592.8 Blocked C of C is not a 3.1/3.2 report
LOT-E8C520 950.4 333 617.4 Base eligible REQ-A2F7 333.00 lb
LOT-9C5F28 385.95 301 84.95 Base eligible REQ-N3K4 301.00 lb
LOT-5C9A16 736 0 736 Base eligible Only current matching requirements have DFARS/CUST-EU origin block
LOT-7E1C95 237.8 237.8 0 Base eligible REQ-F6B8 233.00 lb; REQ-G2J9 4.80 lb
LOT-5B2E88 323.9 323.9 0 Base eligible REQ-D7R4 323.90 lb

    … 4,415 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  22. 22exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py\n@@\n-ws['B8'].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B9'].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B10'].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B11'].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n+for ref in ['B8', 'B9', 'B10']:\n+ ws[ref].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n+for ref in ['B11', 'B12']:\n+ ws[ref].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n*** End Patch"; const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch); text(typeof result === "string" ? r

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py\n@@\n-ws['B8'].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B9'].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B10'].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n-ws['B11'].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n+for ref in ['B8', 'B9', 'B10']:\n+    ws[ref].number_format = '#,##0.00;(#,##0.00);-'\n+for ref in ['B11', 'B12']:\n+    ws[ref].number_format = '$#,##0.00;($#,##0.00);-'\n*** End Patch";
const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch);
text(typeof result === "string" ? r

    … 34 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

{}
  23. 23The supporting workbook is built and its formulas recalculate with zero errors. I’m now packaging the same decisions int…

    The supporting workbook is built and its formulas recalculate with zero errors. I’m now packaging the same decisions into a leadership memo, including the one schedule-risk escalation and the exclusions that make lower-cost material unusable.

  24. 24exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n+const fs = require('fs');\n+const {\n+ AlignmentType,\n+ BorderStyle,\n+ Document,\n+ Footer,\n+ Header,\n+ HeadingLevel,\n+ LevelFormat,\n+ PageBreak,\n+ PageNumber,\n+ Packer,\n+ Paragraph,\n+ ShadingType,\n+ Table,\n+ TableCell,\n+ TableRow,\n+ TextRun,\n+ WidthType,\n+} = require('docx');\n+\n+const OUTPUT = '/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx';\n+const FONT = 'Arial';\n+const NAVY = '17365D';\n+const BLUE = '1F4E78';\n+const PAL

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n+const fs = require('fs');\n+const {\n+  AlignmentType,\n+  BorderStyle,\n+  Document,\n+  Footer,\n+  Header,\n+  HeadingLevel,\n+  LevelFormat,\n+  PageBreak,\n+  PageNumber,\n+  Packer,\n+  Paragraph,\n+  ShadingType,\n+  Table,\n+  TableCell,\n+  TableRow,\n+  TextRun,\n+  WidthType,\n+} = require('docx');\n+\n+const OUTPUT = '/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx';\n+const FONT = 'Arial';\n+const NAVY = '17365D';\n+const BLUE = '1F4E78';\n+const PAL

    … 21,715 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  25. 25Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"NODE_PATH=\"$(npm root -g)\" node /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js && ls -lh /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":60000});
text(result.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.7 seconds
Output:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19K Aug 21 20:11 /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
  26. 26Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":60000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"find /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts -maxdepth 3 -type f -printf '%p\\n' | sort | sed -n '1,120p'","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":20000})
]);
text(results.map((r,i)=>`--- RESULT ${i+1} ---\n${r.output}`).join("\n"));

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.5 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---

Paragraphs: 0 → 179 (+179)
All validations PASSED!

--- RESULT 2 ---
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/__init__.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/accept_changes.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/comment.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/__init__.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/merge_runs.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/simplify_redlines.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/pack.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/unpack.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validators/__init__.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validators/base.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validators/docx.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validato

    … 390 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  27. 27Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec12k chars

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --help","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":20000});
text(result.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.4 seconds
Output:

LibreOffice 25.2.3.2 520(Build:2)

Usage: soffice [argument...]
       argument - switches, switch parameters and document URIs (filenames).   

Using without special arguments:                                               
Opens the start center, if it is used without any arguments.                   
   {file}              Tries to open the file (files) in the components        
                       suitable for them.                                      
   {file} {macro:///Library.Module.MacroName}                                  
                       Opens the file and runs specified macro from            
                       My Macros container.                                    
   {file} {macro://./Library.Module.MacroName}                                 
                       Opens the file and runs specified macro from

    … 10,939 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  28. 28Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"mkdir -p /workspace/analysis/render && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /workspace/analysis/render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx && pdfinfo /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | sed -n '1,40p' && pdftoppm -jpeg -r 120 /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /workspace/analysis/render/memo >/dev/null && ls -lh /workspace/analysis/render | sed -n '1,80p'","workdir":"/workspace"

    … 79 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.4 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx as a Writer document -> /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export
Title:           Material Sourcing Recommendation — 2026 Q3 Door/Hinge Mechanism Build Wave
Author:          Codex
Creator:         Writer
Producer:        LibreOffice 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
CreationDate:    Fri Aug 21 20:11:40 2026 UTC
Custom Metadata: no
Metadata Stream: yes
Tagged:          yes
UserProperties:  no
Suspects:        no
Form:            none
JavaScript:      no
Pages:           4
Encrypted:       no
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
Page rot:        0
File size:       128133 bytes
Optimized:       no
PDF version:     1.7
total 964K
-rw-r--r-- 1 roo

    … 283 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  29. 29exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst results = await Promise.all([ tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-1.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-2.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-3.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-4.jpg","detail":"high"}) ]); for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);1.1M chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-1.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-2.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-3.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo-4.jpg","detail":"high"})
]);
for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

    … 1,131,130 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  30. 30exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n@@\n children.push(new Table({\n width: { size: CONTENT_WIDTH, type: WidthType.DXA },\n columnWidths: [4680, 4680],\n- rows: memoMeta.map(row => new TableRow({ children: [cell(row[0], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE }), cell(row[1], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE })] })),\n+ rows: memoMeta.map(row => new TableRow({ children: [cell([row[0]], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE }), cell([row[1]], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE })] })),\n }));\n@@\n-children.push(new Paragraph({ children: [new PageBreak()] }));\n childr

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n@@\n children.push(new Table({\n   width: { size: CONTENT_WIDTH, type: WidthType.DXA },\n   columnWidths: [4680, 4680],\n-  rows: memoMeta.map(row => new TableRow({ children: [cell(row[0], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE }), cell(row[1], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE })] })),\n+  rows: memoMeta.map(row => new TableRow({ children: [cell([row[0]], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE }), cell([row[1]], 4680, { fill: PALE_BLUE })] })),\n }));\n@@\n-children.push(new Paragraph({ children: [new PageBreak()] }));\n childr

    … 191 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

{}
  31. 31Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"NODE_PATH=\"$(npm root -g)\" node /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":60000}),
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py && python /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx 60","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":

    … 122 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 8.8 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---

Paragraphs: 0 → 178 (+178)
All validations PASSED!

--- RESULT 2 ---
/workspace/analysis/build_workbook.py:191: UserWarning: Could not infer format, so each element will be parsed individually, falling back to `dateutil`. To ensure parsing is consistent and as-expected, please specify a format.
  frame[field] = pd.to_datetime(frame[field], errors='coerce')
/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
{
  "status": "success",
  "total_errors": 0,
  "error_summary": {},
  "total_formulas": 2697
}
  32. 32Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /workspace/analysis/render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx && pdfinfo /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | rg 'Pages|Page size' && pdftoppm -jpeg -r 120 /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /workspace/analysis/render/memo2 >/dev/null && ls /workspace/analysis/render/memo2-*.jpg","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tok

    … 38 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.3 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx as a Writer document -> /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export
Overwriting: /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf
Pages:           4
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-1.jpg
/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-2.jpg
/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-3.jpg
/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-4.jpg
  33. 33exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst results = await Promise.all([ tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-1.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-2.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-3.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-4.jpg","detail":"high"}) ]); for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);1.1M chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-1.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-2.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-3.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/memo2-4.jpg","detail":"high"})
]);
for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

    … 1,139,362 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  34. 34exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n@@\n-children.push(h1('Basis and Boundaries'));\n+children.push(p([run('Basis and Boundaries', { size: 28, bold: true, color: NAVY })], { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1, before: 280, after: 120, keepNext: true, pageBreakBefore: true }));\n*** End Patch"; const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch); text(typeof result === "string" ? result : JSON.stringify(result));

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js\n@@\n-children.push(h1('Basis and Boundaries'));\n+children.push(p([run('Basis and Boundaries', { size: 28, bold: true, color: NAVY })], { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1, before: 280, after: 120, keepNext: true, pageBreakBefore: true }));\n*** End Patch";
const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch);
text(typeof result === "string" ? result : JSON.stringify(result));

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  35. 35I’ve reviewed the memo’s rendered pages and tightened the pagination so the final basis section starts cleanly. I’m doin…

    I’ve reviewed the memo’s rendered pages and tightened the pagination so the final basis section starts cleanly. I’m doing the final document and workbook validation pass now.

  36. 36Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.exec_command({"cmd":"NODE_PATH=\"$(npm root -g)\" node /workspace/analysis/build_memo.js && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /workspace/analysis/render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx >/tmp/memo_convert.log && pdfinfo /workspace/analysis/render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | rg 'Pages|Page size' && pdftoppm

    … 1,548 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 5.5 seconds
Output:

--- RESULT 1 ---

Paragraphs: 0 → 178 (+178)
All validations PASSED!
Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
Pages:           4
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)

--- RESULT 2 ---
{
  "status": "success",
  "total_errors": 0,
  "error_summary": {},
  "total_formulas": 2697
}
Workbook validation passed: 26 requirements covered; 0 formula errors; summary values reconcile.

--- RESULT 3 ---
total 124K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 102K Aug 21 20:12 material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  19K Aug 21 20:11 material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
/bin/bash: line 1: file: command not found
  37. 37exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst results = await Promise.all([ tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/finalmemo-3.jpg","detail":"high"}), tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/finalmemo-4.jpg","detail":"high"}) ]); for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);480k chars

    Arguments

    const results = await Promise.all([
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/finalmemo-3.jpg","detail":"high"}),
  tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/render/finalmemo-4.jpg","detail":"high"})
]);
for (const r of results) image(r.image_url, r.detail);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

    … 478,980 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  38. 38Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"mkdir -p /workspace/analysis/workbook_render && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /workspace/analysis/workbook_render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx >/tmp/workbook_convert.log && pdfinfo /workspace/analysis/workbook_render/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf | rg 'Pages|Page size' && pdftoppm -f 1 -l 1 -jpeg -r 110 /workspace/analysis/workbook_render/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf /workspace/analysis/workbook_render/summary >/dev/nu

    … 246 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.3 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
Pages:           13
Page size:       792 x 612 pts (letter)
ls: cannot access '/workspace/analysis/workbook_render/summary-1.jpg': No such file or directory
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.5M Aug 21 20:12 /workspace/analysis/workbook_render/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf
  39. 39Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const result = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"find /workspace/analysis/workbook_render -maxdepth 1 -type f -printf '%f\\n' | sort","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":20000});
text(result.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf
summary-01.jpg
  40. 40exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst r = await tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/workbook_render/summary-01.jpg","detail":"high"}); image(r.image_url, r.detail);155k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.view_image({"path":"/workspace/analysis/workbook_render/summary-01.jpg","detail":"high"});
image(r.image_url, r.detail);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

    … 153,809 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  41. 41exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst plan = await tools.update_plan({"explanation":"Source facts were reconciled, the compliant allocation and quote plan was built, and both deliverables passed validation.","plan":[{"step":"Extract and reconcile all source material requirements, inventory, approvals, quotes, policy, and schedules","status":"completed"},{"step":"Determine compliant coverage, allocation sequence, purchase feasibility, and escalations","status":"completed"},{"step":"Create and validate the sourcing analysis workbook","status":"completed"},{"step":"Create and validate

    Arguments

    const plan = await tools.update_plan({"explanation":"Source facts were reconciled, the compliant allocation and quote plan was built, and both deliverables passed validation.","plan":[{"step":"Extract and reconcile all source material requirements, inventory, approvals, quotes, policy, and schedules","status":"completed"},{"step":"Determine compliant coverage, allocation sequence, purchase feasibility, and escalations","status":"completed"},{"step":"Create and validate the sourcing analysis workbook","status":"completed"},{"step":"Create and validate

    … 97 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  42. 42Completed the sourcing review deliverables: - [Recommendation memo](/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_m…

    Completed the sourcing review deliverables:

    • Recommendation memo
    • Supporting analysis workbook

    Key result: all 26 requirements have a compliant coverage path using 5,857.25 lb of yield-adjusted inventory plus 3,102.75 lb from 12 recommended quote lines. Planning spend is $32,948.22 at stated unit prices/minimum orders ($49,310.00 if full offered quote quantities are required).

    The plan flags REQ-L8Q4 (Sable 4340 plate) for PMO/Quality/Sourcing escalation because its compliant quote docks only two days before need-by. All C-of-C-only, partial-traceability, held, non-approved/conditional, non-qualifying-origin, and late material is excluded from certified-production coverage.

    The workbook recalculated with zero formula errors, and the memo passed document validation.

2 failure modes across 3 verifier failures

  1. 1Escalation or Tradeoff Communication IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Presentation and Communication2 failures

    Description

    Does the final communication omit or conflate a required escalation, rejected attractive alternative, disqualifying reason, residual risk, or distinction between a feasible plan and separate process actions?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • The memo never cleanly pairs the required no-hard-sourcing-dead-end assertion with a separately listed set of quality or process escalations, either because a genuine shortfall remains unstated as such or because the two kinds of issue are conflated.

    • The memo argues compliance over price or lead time but omits naming at least one of the three required attractive, cheaper, or faster non-compliant quotes along with the specific reason it was rejected.

  2. 2Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Deliverable Completion and Structure1 failure

    Description

    Must a reviewer join separate sheets or infer unstated links to connect an item or requirement with its inputs, alternatives, decision, rationale, quantities, and resulting economics?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.