EKWbench
Switch benchEKWbench
Request dataset samplesby

task_111Manufacturing

16 verifiers · 15 core · 1 secondary · 16 LLM-graded

TaxonomyManufacturingBuyers and purchasing agents

All trialsGPT-5.6 SolcodexTrial 02

68%

Trial reward

GPT-5.6 SolFail

Trial 02 — 3rd of 4 by reward score. This model averages 74.5% across 4 trials on this task.

  • 10/15Core verifiers passed
  • 11/16All verifiers passed
  • 5Core failed
  • 45Turns
  • 33Tool calls
  • $3.86Cost
  • 36.5mTime
  • 67kOutput tokens

Missed 5 of 15 core — country_of_origin, traceability and residual_vs_moq and 2 more.

core (15)

  • usable_quantityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Coverage must be assessed on usable yield-adjusted quantity net of allocations, and the original attempt's central risk is treating gross or physically-present pounds as usable.

    How to pass

    Checks that the analysis workbook reports usable on-hand quantity using the formula (On Hand - Allocated) x Yield Factor for inventory lots rather than gross on-hand pounds.

    Reads

  • country_of_originLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Country-of-origin restrictions are binding contractual constraints, and the cheapest/fastest options for several critical lines are non-qualifying-origin material that must not be selected.

    How to pass

    Checks that material melted in China or Russia is excluded for the DFARS programs (Raven, Sable) and the CUST-EU programs (Meridian, Tundra) regardless of price or certificate quality.

    Reads

    Failure mode Required Evidence Fields or Rows Omitted

    Why it failed

    The workbook avoids allocating China or Russia melt to the restricted programs but does not show the explicit origin-based rejection reason for those lots or quotes.

    Justification

    Although no China/Russia material is allocated to Raven/Sable/Meridian/Tundra, the required quote-level origin-rejection evidence is not fully shown. The extract explicitly rejects LOT-5C9A16 for Raven/Sable ('China melt fails DFARS restriction'), LOT-2B7E54 for Raven, and LOT-C7A340 for Meridian, but QTE-4E9A72 (Yellow River China 300M) appears only in Quote Raw with no shown rejection row, and the shown quote entries for QTE-7D2B40 and QTE-9C4E27 do not give a clear origin-based rejection reason ('NOT ACTIONABLE' / 'REJECT—source status Not Approved').

  • cert_traceabilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    EN 10204 3.1/3.2 certification and full traceability are minimum eligibility gates, and the original attempt risks accepting C-of-C or non-traceable material that is physically attractive.

    How to pass

    Checks that Certificate-of-Conformance-only lots/quotes and partial-traceability lots are excluded from certified-production coverage.

    Reads

  • source_hold_statusLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Approved-source status and hold status are hard eligibility gates, and otherwise-attractive USA-origin material from these sources must not be planned against requirements.

    How to pass

    Checks that sources in Suspended, Conditional, or Not Approved status, and material under an open quality/MRB or receiving-inspection hold, are excluded from new commitments.

    Reads

  • substitution_policyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The substitution policy is exhaustive and prohibits interchange (e.g., T651 vs T7351, /11 vs /12, bar vs plate vs extrusion), so a model must not silently treat near-match material as covering a callout.

    How to pass

    Checks that no alloy, temper/condition, product-form, or specification sub-spec substitution is applied beyond same-spec oversize/remnant cutdown.

    Reads

  • allocation_priorityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Program-priority allocation is an explicit contention rule, and getting it wrong misassigns scarce compliant stock between competing programs.

    How to pass

    Checks that contested inventory lots usable by more than one requirement are allocated to the higher-priority (lower rank number) program first, with lower-priority shortfalls flowing to new purchase.

    Reads

  • lead_time_feasibilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Lead-time feasibility is an explicit gate, and the original attempt risks counting a compliant quote that docks on or after need-by as resolving a requirement on schedule.

    How to pass

    Checks that a supplier quote is treated as feasible only when its quoted dock/receipt date precedes the requirement need-by date.

    Reads

  • requirement_coverageLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level coverage classification is the core analytical output the task asks for and must be complete across all demand lines.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook classifies each of the 26 requirements into a coverage disposition (covered from compliant inventory, partial inventory plus buy, or full new purchase) at the requirement-ID level.

    Reads

  • traceabilityLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level traceability is an explicit auditability obligation and is exactly where a weaker solution omits the why-rejected evidence chain.

    How to pass

    Checks that for each at-risk requirement the workbook records the selected inventory lot(s) with usable quantity, the rejected lots with reasons, the selected quote, the rejected quote alternatives with reasons, the residual after inventory, and the resulting purchase quantity and cost.

    Reads

    Failure mode Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or Incomplete

    Why it failed

    Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.

    Justification

    The provided extract does not show a single requirement-level view that ties together all required elements for at-risk lines. 'Requirement Analysis' gives inventory gap and a preferred quote ID, but not selected lot IDs, rejected lot reasons, rejected/alternative quote reasons, or resulting purchase quantity/cost; those are split across 'Inventory Allocation', 'Inventory Candidates', 'Quote Allocation', and 'Quote Review', while PO quantity/cost are only visible in aggregate on 'Executive Summary' (3621.5 lb, $32,288.42).

  • residual_vs_moqLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Conflating need with MOQ-inflated buy quantity was a defect in the earlier attempt and obscures both true demand and committed spend.

    How to pass

    Checks that requirement residual quantity is reported separately from the minimum-order-quantity-adjusted purchase quantity, with the excess identified.

    Reads

    Failure mode Required Evidence Fields or Rows Omitted

    Why it failed

    MOQ-driven buys show the residual need and the MOQ-adjusted order quantity across various sheets but never state the excess amount as its own value.

    Justification

    The workbook shows requirement residuals and quote MOQs, but not the MOQ-adjusted order quantity and excess for the affected buys. For example, REQ-S6P3 shows a 69.5 lb gap and uses quote QTE-9E4B27 with a 250 lb MOQ, and REQ-E9C1 shows a 1.75 lb gap against quote QTE-C1E7B4 with a 250 lb MOQ; however no row shows the 250 lb planned order or the per-line excess. Only aggregate metrics ('Planning PO quantity' 3621.5 lb and 'MOQ-driven planning excess' 518.75 lb) are shown.

  • cost_reconciliationLLMPass
    Why it matters

    A reconciled, self-consistent committed total was an explicit fix from the earlier attempt, where the memo and PO tab disagreed on the headline figure and shared lines risked double-charging.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook presents a single authoritative total committed new-buy cost with no conflicting totals and a cost chain that reconciles, with shared quote lines not double-counted.

    Reads

  • escalation_languageLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Clarifying escalation language so that 'every requirement has a feasible path' is not conflated with quality holds awaiting action was an explicit obligation from the earlier revision.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo states there is no hard sourcing dead-end while separately listing quality/MRB/process escalations.

    Reads

    Failure mode Escalation or Tradeoff Communication Incomplete

    Why it failed

    The memo never cleanly pairs the required no-hard-sourcing-dead-end assertion with a separately listed set of quality or process escalations, either because a genuine shortfall remains unstated as such or because the two kinds of issue are conflated.

    Justification

    The memo does not assert that every requirement still has a compliant, schedule-feasible sourcing path; instead it says 'Current uncovered demand | 3,102.75 usable lb,' 'Current executable selected quotes | 0 of 12,' and some need-bys/build starts have already passed. While it separately lists process actions like disposition of LOT-B3E7C0 and LOT-8F4D17 and confirming tentative lines, it also treats those hold issues as coverage gaps (e.g., REQ-V1D9 'held/unapproved stock excluded' and REQ-U4B8 'held lot excluded') rather than cleanly separating quality/MRB escalations from sourcing feasibility.

  • memo_recommendationLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The task's core decision principle is distinguishing usable material from merely cheap/fast/available material, and the memo is where that reasoning must be made legible to leadership.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo recommends a sourcing/allocation plan that prioritizes compliance over lowest price or shortest lead time and explicitly identifies rejected cheaper/faster non-compliant options.

    Reads

  • no_fabrication_side_effectsLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The task forbids inventing options beyond the source packet, and penalizing fabricated content or unrequested side-additions protects against hallucinated uplift that would look like a stronger answer.

    How to pass

    Checks that the deliverables do not introduce fabricated alloys, tempers, substitutions, approvals, waivers, expedite options, or other material not present in the source files, and do not add materially unsolicited deliverables.

    Reads

  • residual_po_reconciliationLLMFail
    Why it matters

    The shared-PO double-counting failure mode (inflating the committed total by billing one quote line at each requirement's minimum) is exactly where the earlier attempt produced an unreconciled headline figure, and catching it is a fair, materially distinct core check.

    How to pass

    Checks that the sum of per-requirement residual purchase needs reconciles to the consolidated purchase-order quantities and committed cost, so shared quote lines are not double-counted across the requirements they serve.

    Reads

    Failure mode Required Evidence Fields or Rows Omitted

    Why it failed

    The workbook has no purchase-order sheet, ordered quantities, or committed cost to reconcile the residuals against.

    Justification

    It only shows a Packet-Date Quote Allocation Baseline and explicitly says all 12 preferred quote lines are expired, none is a current PO authorization, and no executed-PO evidence is assumed. Therefore the residuals are not reconciled to actual purchase orders and committed cost as the rubric requires.

secondary (1)

  • memo_consistencyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    If the memo asserts headline counts or program restriction classes, they must be accurate and self-consistent; this guards against a confidently-stated but wrong summary rather than mandating an unprompted structure.

    How to pass

    Checks that any coverage counts or per-program restriction classes the memo chooses to state are internally consistent and correct, without forcing the memo to include specific counts.

    Reads

2 deliverables · what this trial produced

material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx118 KB

Executive Summary35 rows

Material Sourcing Recommendation — Decision Dashboard
2026 Q3 certified door/hinge build wave | Compliance-gated inventory, quote, allocation, cost, and delivery review
Decision controlsPortfolio decision at current review date
Current review date46254Reserve only the compliant lot allocations documented in Inventory Allocation.
Packet cutoff date46193Do not count held, C-of-C-only, partially traceable, conditional/suspended/unapproved, wrong-family, or restricted-origin material.
Engineering policyENG-MSP Rev H | effective 2026-05-15The packet-date baseline identified 12 preferred quote lines, but all 12 are expired as of 2026-08-20; none is a current PO authorization.
Priority releasePC-2026-0618 | status 2026-06-19Escalate 15 uncovered requirements (3,102.75 usable lb) for documented quote revalidation/replacement; Raven and Sable remain first in recovery priority.
Portfolio metrics
Requirements26
Net demand (usable lb)8960
Compliant inventory allocated (usable lb)5857.25
Portfolio inventory coverage0.6537109375
Inventory-full requirements11
Inventory-partial requirements8
Inventory-none requirements7
Current uncovered demand (usable lb)3102.75
At-risk requirements15
Preferred packet quote lines12
Preferred quote lines open now0
Planning PO quantity (lb)3621.5
MOQ-driven planning excess (lb)518.75
Historical packet planning cost32288.42
Program exposure after compliant on-hand allocation (current quote credit = zero where expired)
PriorityProgramRestrictionBuild StartDemandInventory Alloc.Current GapInventory %Firm GapTentative Gap
1PRG-RAVENDFARS4625120271525.6501.40.752639368524914501.40
2PRG-SABLEDFARS462651218339.2878.80.278489326765189591.8287
3PRG-MERIDIANCUST-EU4629316281252.7375.30.769471744471745221.1154.2
4PRG-TUNDRACUST-EU4631413097395700.564553093964859357213
5PRG-HALCYONNone4633516601201.5458.50.72379518072289238969.5
6PRG-CALDERNone463491118799.25318.750.714892665474061161.75157
Interpretation and controls
Packet-date baseline: selected technically compliant quotes, promised receipt dates, and historical unit prices as documented. This view shows what should have been released before expiry.
Current view: a quote contributes zero coverage after expiry unless a documented revalidation or executed PO is present. The packet contains no executed-PO evidence, so none is assumed.
Timing gate: promised receipt must be strictly before need-by. No undocumented expedite or minimum inspection duration is assumed; positive margins are shown and the two-day Sable buffer is flagged.
Purchase planning cost uses max(residual, MOQ) × quoted unit price where the result does not exceed quoted quantity. This is an analytical baseline; procurement must confirm price applicability when revalidating.
Sources embedded in workbook: MRP forecast, WMS/QMS lot snapshot, AMSL Rev N, supplier quote matrix, ENG-MSP Rev H, and PC-2026-0618 program schedule.

User prompt → 45 turns · 33 tool calls → final responsecodex

  1. 1systemskills instructions · Skills A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of s…

    skills instructions

    Skills

    A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and source locator. file locators are on the host filesystem, executor package locators are owned by their execution environment, orchestrator package locators are opaque package identifiers, and custom resource locators use their provider's access mechanism.

    Available skills

    • imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)
    • openai-docs: Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)
    • plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required .codex-plugin/plugin.json, optional plugin folders/files, valid manifest defaults, and personal-marketplace entries by default. Use when Codex needs to create a new personal plugin, add optional plugin structure, generate or update marketplace entries for plugi

    … 3,403 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  2. 2systemYou are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals. At the start of your tur…

    You are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals.

    At the start of your turn, you are the active agent.
    You can spawn sub-agents to handle subtasks, and those sub-agents can spawn their own sub-agents.
    All agents in the team, including the agents that you can assign tasks to, are equally intelligent and capable, and have access to the same set of tools.

    You can use spawn_agent to create a new agent, followup_task to give an existing agent a new task and trigger a turn, and send_message to pass a message to a running agent without triggering a turn.
    Child agents can also spawn their own sub-agents.
    You can decide how much context you want to propagate to your sub-agents with the fork_turns parameter.

    You will receive messages in the analysis channel in the form:

    Message Type: MESSAGE | FINAL_ANSWER
Task name: <recipient>
Sender: <author>
Payload:
<payload text>

    They may be addressed as to=/root

    Note that collaboration tools cannot be called from inside functions.exec. Call spawn_agent, send_message, followup_task, wait_agent, interrupt_agent, and list_agents only as direct tool calls using the recipient shown in their tool definitions, such as to=functions.collaboration.spawn_agent, since they are intentionally absent from the functions.exec tools.* namespace. Available tools in functions.exec are explicitly described with a tools namespace in the developer message.

    All agents share the same directory. In detail:

    • All agents have access to the same container and filesystem as you.
    • All agents use the same current working directory.
    • As a result, edits made by one agent are immediately visible to all other agents.

    When calling wait_agent, prefer longer waits (minutes) to avoid busy polling.

    There are 4 available concurrency slots, meaning that up to 4 agents can be active at once, including you.

    Full-history forks (fork_turns omitted or "all") inherit the parent mod

    … 264 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  3. 3systemmulti agent mode · Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub…

    multi agent mode

    Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub-agents unless the user or applicable AGENTS.md/skill instructions explicitly ask for sub-agents, delegation, or parallel agent work.

  4. 4userenvironment context · /workspace bash 2026-08-20 Etc/UTC /workspace

    environment context

    cwd
    /workspace
    shell
    bash
    current date
    2026-08-20
    timezone
    Etc/UTC
    root
    /workspace
  5. 5userYou are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hi…

    You are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hinge mechanism assemblies. Upcoming production lots require aluminum and steel raw materials, including plate, bar, extrusion, and machined-stock inputs. Several material requirements are at risk because available inventory, supplier quotes, lead times, certification status, source approvals, allocations, yield loss, and program priorities do not all align. Production and sourcing leadership need a sourcing plan that identifies which material lots can be used, which supplier quotes should be acted on, which requirements remain at risk, and which program commitments should be prioritized. The objective is not simply to buy the cheapest or fastest available material; the recommendation must distinguish physically available material from material that is actually usable for certified aerospace production. Using the attached material sourcing packet, determine the recommended sourcing and allocation plan for the current review cycle. Identify which aluminum and steel requirements can be covered from compliant on-hand inventory, which require new purchases, which supplier quotes are feasible, and which shortages or compliance issues require escalation. Evaluate the tradeoffs among material specification, temper or condition, product form, mill certification, traceability, approved-source status, country-of-origin or customer restrictions, available quantity after allocation, usable yield, lead time, cost, and program delivery impact. Work only from the attached materials: the material demand forecast, inventory lot and certification snapshot, approved material source list, supplier quote and lead-time matrix, engineering material substitution policy, and program priority / build schedule. Do not invent alternate alloys, tempers, substitutions, engineering approvals, customer waivers, supplier capacity, expedite options, certification corrections, yield a

    … 1,544 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  6. 6I’m using the xlsx and docx skills because the required outputs are a traceable analysis workbook and a leadership-ready…

    I’m using the xlsx and docx skills because the required outputs are a traceable analysis workbook and a leadership-ready Word memo. I’ll first map the packet’s constraints and calculations, then build and validate both deliverables in /workspace/output/.

  7. 7Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec19k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '1,240p' /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md && sed -n '1,260p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

---
name: xlsx
description: "Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like \"the xlsx in my downloads\") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python

    … 17,979 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  8. 8Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec14k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"wc -l /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md && sed -n '241,520p' /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md && sed -n '261,620p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

  291 /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md
  590 /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md
  881 total
- [ ] **Wrong references**: Verify all cell references point to intended cells (#REF!)
- [ ] **Cross-sheet references**: Use correct format (Sheet1!A1) for linking sheets

### Formula Testing Strategy
- [ ] **Start small**: Test formulas on 2-3 cells before applying broadly
- [ ] **Verify dependencies**: Check all cells referenced in formulas exist
- [ ] **Test edge cases**: Include zero, negative, and very large values

### Interpreting scripts/recalc.py Output
The script returns JSON with error details:
```json
{
  "status": "success",           // or "errors_found"
  "total_errors": 0,              // Total error count
  "total_formulas": 42,           // Number of formulas in file
  "error_summary": {              // Only present if errors found
    "#RE

    … 12,884 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  9. 9exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst p = await tools.update_plan({plan:[ {step:"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"in_progress"}, {step:"Apply compliance gates, allocations, yield, timing, and priority rules to determine sourcing recommendations","status":"pending"}, {step:"Build and recalculate the traceable Excel analysis workbook","status":"pending"}, {step:"Draft and validate the leadership recommendation memo","status":"pending"}, {step:"Cross-check both deliverables for consistency and f

    Arguments

    const p = await tools.update_plan({plan:[
  {step:"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"in_progress"},
  {step:"Apply compliance gates, allocations, yield, timing, and priority rules to determine sourcing recommendations","status":"pending"},
  {step:"Build and recalculate the traceable Excel analysis workbook","status":"pending"},
  {step:"Draft and validate the leadership recommendation memo","status":"pending"},
  {step:"Cross-check both deliverables for consistency and f

    … 263 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

{}
data/approved_material_source_list.xlsx
data/engineering_material_substitution_policy.pdf
data/inventory_lot_cert_snapshot.xlsx
data/material_demand_forecast.xlsx
data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx
data/supplier_quote_leadtime_matrix.xlsx
  10. 10The packet also contains a PDF engineering policy, so I’m adding the pdf skill to extract and verify its substitution ru…

    The packet also contains a PDF engineering policy, so I’m adding the pdf skill to extract and verify its substitution rules before making any usability decision. That policy will be treated as a hard gate, alongside source approval and certification evidence.

  11. 11Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec9k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"sed -n '1,320p' /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md && wc -l /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

---
name: pdf
description: Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text/tables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting/decrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.
license: Proprietary. LICENSE.txt has complete terms
---

# PDF Processing Guide

## Overview

This guide covers essential PDF processing operations using Python libraries and command-line tools. For advanced features, JavaScript libraries, and detailed examples, see REFERENCE.md. If you need to fill out a PDF form, read FORMS.md and follow its instructions.

## Quick Start

```python
from pypdf im

    … 7,528 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  12. 12Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec35k chars

    Arguments

    const cmds = [
  tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfor path in sorted(Path('data').glob('*.xlsx')):\n    print(f'FILE: {path}')\n    wb = load_workbook(path, data_only=False, read_only=True)\n    for ws in wb.worksheets:\n        print(f'SHEET: {ws.title} rows={ws.max_row} cols={ws.max_column}')\n        for row in ws.iter_rows(values_only=True):\n            print(repr(row))\n        print()\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":50000}),
  tools.exec_command({

    … 456 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.8 seconds
Output:

RESULT 1
FILE: data/approved_material_source_list.xlsx
SHEET: Source List rows=13 cols=9
('Source ID', 'Source Name', 'Source Type', 'Approved Spec Families', 'Melt Country', 'Origin Qualifying Status', 'Approval Status', 'Approval Expiry', 'Note')
('SRC-9F2A41', 'Cascade Rolled Products LLC', 'Mill', 'AMS-QQ-A-250, AMS-QQ-A-200, AMS 4117', 'USA', 'Qualifying (USA)', 'Approved', '2027-03-31', 'Aluminum plate/extrusion/bar')
('SRC-3B7C19', 'Ardenne Steelworks SA', 'Mill', 'AMS 5862, AMS 5659, AMS 5604', 'France', 'Qualifying (non-US)', 'Approved', '2026-12-31', 'PH stainless; qualifying country (FR)')
('SRC-D14E8B', 'Tri-State Metals Distribution', 'Distributor', 'AMS-QQ-A-250, AMS-QQ-A-200, AMS 6415, AMS 6359', 'USA', 'Qualifying (USA)', 'Approved', '2027-06-30', 'Distributor; passes mill cert

    … 34,456 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  13. 13The source structure is now clear: 26 demand lines, 24 inventory lots, 32 quotes, one controlled source list, and the en…

    The source structure is now clear: 26 demand lines, 24 inventory lots, 32 quotes, one controlled source list, and the engineering policy. I’m extracting the program schedule next, then I’ll reconcile every candidate through exact-callout, certification/traceability, source/origin, quantity/yield, and timing gates.

  14. 14Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec5k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom docx import Document\np='data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx'\ndoc=Document(p)\nprint('PARAGRAPHS')\nfor i,para in enumerate(doc.paragraphs):\n    if para.text.strip(): print(i, repr(para.text))\nfor ti,table in enumerate(doc.tables):\n    print(f'TABLE {ti+1} rows={len(table.rows)} cols={len(table.columns)}')\n    for row in table.rows:\n        print(tuple(cell.text for cell in row.cells))\nfor si,sec in enumerate(doc.sections):\n    print(f'SECTION {si+1} HEADER')\n    for para in sec.header.par

    … 307 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.3 seconds
Output:

PARAGRAPHS
0 'Program Priority & Build Schedule'
1 '2026 Q3 Door/Hinge Mechanism Build Wave — Production Control Release PC-2026-0618'
2 'Issued by: Production Control & Program Management Office (PMO).  Distribution: Sourcing, Materials Planning, Quality, MRB.  Status as of 2026-06-19.'
3 '1. Purpose'
4 'This release fixes program priority ranking and committed build dates for the current review cycle. Where multiple programs compete for the same eligible material, allocation shall favor the higher-priority program (lower priority rank number). Contractual country-of-origin and specialty-metals restrictions stated in Section 3 are flowed from the customer contracts and are binding on sourcing decisions; they are not discretionary and may not be relaxed for cost or schedule convenience.'
5 '2. Program Priority Ranking and Build Commitments'
6 'Note:

    … 3,542 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  15. 15Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"stat -c '%n | modified %y | size %s' data/* && unzip -p data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx docProps/core.xml | sed -n '1,160p'","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

data/approved_material_source_list.xlsx | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:35.000000000 +0000 | size 7788
data/engineering_material_substitution_policy.pdf | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:35.000000000 +0000 | size 8258
data/inventory_lot_cert_snapshot.xlsx | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:29.000000000 +0000 | size 9968
data/material_demand_forecast.xlsx | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:35.000000000 +0000 | size 9221
data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:35.000000000 +0000 | size 13747
data/supplier_quote_leadtime_matrix.xlsx | modified 2026-08-20 16:33:35.000000000 +0000 | size 12985
/bin/bash: line 1: unzip: command not found
  16. 16Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec2k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"find /root/.agents/skills/xlsx -maxdepth 3 -type f -print | sort && find /root/.agents/skills/docx -maxdepth 4 -type f -print | sort | sed -n '1,120p'","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":20000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/LICENSE.txt
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/office/pack.py
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/office/soffice.py
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/office/unpack.py
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/office/validate.py
/root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/LICENSE.txt
/root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/__init__.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/accept_changes.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/comment.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/__init__.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/merge_runs.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/helpers/simplify_redlines.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/pack.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py
/root/.agents/skills/docx/scrip

    … 701 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  17. 17Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"node -e \"console.log(require.resolve('docx'))\" && libreoffice --version && python - <<'PY'\nimport openpyxl, pandas, docx\nprint('openpyxl', openpyxl.__version__)\nprint('pandas', pandas.__version__)\nprint('python-docx', docx.__version__)\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1433
  throw err;
  ^

Error: Cannot find module 'docx'
Require stack:
- /workspace/[eval]
    at Function._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1430:15)
    at Function.resolve (node:internal/modules/helpers:157:19)
    at [eval]:1:21
    at runScriptInThisContext (node:internal/vm:209:10)
    at node:internal/process/execution:446:12
    at [eval]-wrapper:6:24
    at runScriptInContext (node:internal/process/execution:444:60)
    at evalFunction (node:internal/process/execution:279:30)
    at evalTypeScript (node:internal/process/execution:291:3)
    at node:internal/main/eval_string:74:3 {
  code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
  requireStack: [ '/workspace/[eval]' ]
}

Node.js v22.23.2
  18. 18Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom decimal import Decimal\nreq = {\n'H4A2':(842,516.6),'K9P1':(615,615),'C9T1':(176,0),'X5M3':(394,394),\n'T2C7':(430,106.2),'B6N3':(268,0),'F6B8':(233,233),'L8Q4':(287,0),\n'M1X8':(512,512),'D7R4':(347,323.9),'W3F9':(198,0),'R7W2':(412,412),'G2J9':(159,4.8),\n'J5G7':(455,455),'P2H6':(284,284),'V1D9':(357,0),'Y8K2':(213,0),\n'Q8L5':(726,726),'Z4V2':(389,0),'N3K4':(301,301),'S6P3':(244,174.5),\n'A2F7':(333,333),'E9C1':(271,269.25),'U4B8':(162,5),'H7D5':(205,45),'W9A3':(147,147)}\nprint('demand',sum(v[0] for v in

    … 304 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

demand 8960
inventory allocated 5857.25
shortage 3102.75
H4A2 842 516.6 325.4
K9P1 615 615 0
C9T1 176 0 176
X5M3 394 394 0
T2C7 430 106.2 323.8
B6N3 268 0 268
F6B8 233 233 0
L8Q4 287 0 287
M1X8 512 512 0
D7R4 347 323.9 23.1
W3F9 198 0 198
R7W2 412 412 0
G2J9 159 4.8 154.2
J5G7 455 455 0
P2H6 284 284 0
V1D9 357 0 357
Y8K2 213 0 213
Q8L5 726 726 0
Z4V2 389 0 389
N3K4 301 301 0
S6P3 244 174.5 69.5
A2F7 333 333 0
E9C1 271 269.25 1.75
U4B8 162 5 157
H7D5 205 45 160
W9A3 147 147 0
  19. 19Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\norders=[('A3F91C',593.4,9.4,593.4),('8B3F19',176,14.2,176),('3A9F18',680.8,11.75,680.8),('6D1B84',287,6.9,287),('9A2E57',389,5.45,389),('2D7C64',236.1,7.6,236.1),('2F8C41',198,9.85,198),('1A6E38',154.2,5.75,154.2),('9E4B27',250,8.7,69.5),('C1E7B4',250,8.9,1.75),('7E2A85',157,11.1,157),('D9F3B1',250,5.35,160)]\nprint(sum(q for _,q,_,_ in orders),sum(need for *_,need in orders),sum(q-need for _,q,_,need in orders),sum(q*p for _,q,p,_ in orders))\nfor o in orders: print(o[0],o[1]*o[2], 'excess',o[1]-o[3])\nPY","workdir

    … 93 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

3621.4999999999995 3102.7499999999995 518.75 32288.420000000002
A3F91C 5577.96 excess 0.0
8B3F19 2499.2 excess 0
3A9F18 7999.4 excess 0.0
6D1B84 1980.3000000000002 excess 0
9A2E57 2120.05 excess 0
2D7C64 1794.36 excess 0.0
2F8C41 1950.3 excess 0
1A6E38 886.65 excess 0.0
9E4B27 2175.0 excess 180.5
C1E7B4 2225.0 excess 248.25
7E2A85 1742.7 excess 0
D9F3B1 1337.5 excess 90
  20. 20Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nvals=[5557.96,8304.15,3012.51,5813.55,4295.05,5305.2]\nprint(sum(vals))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":1000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

32288.420000000002
  21. 21The compliance reconciliation shows a sharp distinction between stock and usable stock: several seemingly attractive lot…

    The compliance reconciliation shows a sharp distinction between stock and usable stock: several seemingly attractive lots fail on DFARS/customer origin, source status, holds, certificate type, or traceability. I’m preserving those rejections explicitly in the workbook so leadership can see why price or physical availability does not create certified-production coverage.

  22. 22Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"npm install --prefix /tmp/material-docx docx@9.5.1","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":20000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.1 seconds
Output:


added 22 packages in 2s

1 package is looking for funding
  run `npm fund` for details
  23. 23exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst p = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"All six packet sources are extracted. The requirement-by-requirement compliance and priority allocation logic is established; I am now encoding it into the traceable workbook and validating calculations.","plan":[{"step":"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"completed"},{"step":"Apply compliance gates, allocations, yield, timing, and priority rules to determine sourcing recommendations","status":"completed"},{"step":"Build and recalcu

    Arguments

    const p = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"All six packet sources are extracted. The requirement-by-requirement compliance and priority allocation logic is established; I am now encoding it into the traceable workbook and validating calculations.","plan":[{"step":"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"completed"},{"step":"Apply compliance gates, allocations, yield, timing, and priority rules to determine sourcing recommendations","status":"completed"},{"step":"Build and recalcu

    … 307 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  24. 24exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_sourcing.py\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+from datetime import date, datetime\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+from docx import Document as WordDocument\n+from openpyxl import Workbook, load_workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.worksheet.table import Table, TableStyleInfo\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path(\"/workspa

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_sourcing.py\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+from datetime import date, datetime\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+from docx import Document as WordDocument\n+from openpyxl import Workbook, load_workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.worksheet.table import Table, TableStyleInfo\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path(\"/workspa

    … 66,195 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  25. 25Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python build_material_sourcing.py","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.3 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
  26. 26Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx 90","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);
if (r.session_id) text(`SESSION_ID=${r.session_id}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 5.4 seconds
Output:

status: errors_found
total_errors: 1
error_summary:
  #DIV/0!:
    count: 1
    locations:
      - Executive Summary!C14
total_formulas: 2193
  27. 27The workbook is built and recalculating. One dashboard ratio exposed an off-by-one cell reference during validation; the…

    The workbook is built and recalculating. One dashboard ratio exposed an off-by-one cell reference during validation; the underlying allocation and quote formulas are intact. I’m correcting that reference, then I’ll run a second zero-error recalculation and sample-audit the totals.

  28. 28exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_sourcing.py\n@@\n- (\"Portfolio inventory coverage\", \"=B13/B12\", PERCENT_FMT),\n+ (\"Portfolio inventory coverage\", \"=IF(C12=0,0,C13/C12)\", PERCENT_FMT),\n*** End Patch"; const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch); text(result);

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_sourcing.py\n@@\n-    (\"Portfolio inventory coverage\", \"=B13/B12\", PERCENT_FMT),\n+    (\"Portfolio inventory coverage\", \"=IF(C12=0,0,C13/C12)\", PERCENT_FMT),\n*** End Patch";
const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch);
text(result);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  29. 29Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r1 = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python build_material_sourcing.py","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r1.output);
const r2 = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx 90","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r2.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 6.1 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx

status: success
total_errors: 0
error_summary: {}
total_formulas: 2193
  30. 30Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec8k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwbv=load_workbook(p,data_only=True,read_only=True)\nprint(wbv.sheetnames)\nws=wbv['Executive Summary']\nfor r in range(5,25):\n    print(r,ws.cell(r,1).value,ws.cell(r,3).value)\nprint('PROGRAMS')\nfor r in range(28,34): print([ws.cell(r,c).value for c in range(1,11)])\nprint('REQ')\nws=wbv['Requirement Analysis']\nfor r in range(5,31): print([ws.cell(r,c).value for c in [1,3,13,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23]])\nprint('PURCH

    … 435 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.3 seconds
Output:

['Executive Summary', 'Demand Raw', 'Inventory Raw', 'Quote Raw', 'Source List', 'Program Rules', 'Policy Rules', 'Inventory Allocation', 'Quote Allocation', 'Requirement Analysis', 'Inventory Lot Review', 'Inventory Candidates', 'Quote Review', 'Quote Candidates', 'Purchase Plan', 'Escalations']
5 Current review date None
6 Packet cutoff date None
7 Engineering policy None
8 Priority release None
9 None None
10 Portfolio metrics None
11 Requirements 26
12 Net demand (usable lb) 8960
13 Compliant inventory allocated (usable lb) 5857.25
14 Portfolio inventory coverage 0.6537109375
15 Inventory-full requirements 11
16 Inventory-partial requirements 8
17 Inventory-none requirements 7
18 Current uncovered demand (usable lb) 3102.75
19 At-risk requirements 15
20 Preferred packet quote lines 12
21 Preferred quote lines open now 0
22 Planning PO quantity (lb

    … 6,889 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  31. 31The validated workbook now shows 8,960 lb of demand, 5,857.25 lb of compliant on-hand allocation, and a 3,102.75 lb gap…

    The validated workbook now shows 8,960 lb of demand, 5,857.25 lb of compliant on-hand allocation, and a 3,102.75 lb gap across 15 requirements. The historical preferred-quote plan would have covered that gap for about $32,288 with 518.75 lb of MOQ excess, but all 12 selected quote lines are expired as of August 20; I’m carrying that distinction prominently into the memo.

  32. 32exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_sourcing_memo.js\n+const fs = require(\"fs\");\n+const {\n+ AlignmentType, BorderStyle, Document, Footer, Header, HeadingLevel, LevelFormat,\n+ PageNumber, PageOrientation, Packer, Paragraph, SectionType, ShadingType,\n+ Table, TableCell, TableRow, TabStopPosition, TabStopType, TextRun,\n+ VerticalAlign, WidthType,\n+} = require(\"/tmp/material-docx/node_modules/docx\");\n+\n+const OUT = \"/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx\";\n+const NAVY = \"17365D\", BLUE = \"1F

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_sourcing_memo.js\n+const fs = require(\"fs\");\n+const {\n+  AlignmentType, BorderStyle, Document, Footer, Header, HeadingLevel, LevelFormat,\n+  PageNumber, PageOrientation, Packer, Paragraph, SectionType, ShadingType,\n+  Table, TableCell, TableRow, TabStopPosition, TabStopType, TextRun,\n+  VerticalAlign, WidthType,\n+} = require(\"/tmp/material-docx/node_modules/docx\");\n+\n+const OUT = \"/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx\";\n+const NAVY = \"17365D\", BLUE = \"1F

    … 27,927 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  33. 33Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"node build_material_sourcing_memo.js","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.7 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
  34. 34Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.3 seconds
Output:


Paragraphs: 0 → 458 (+458)
All validations PASSED!
  35. 35Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec20k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"mkdir -p /tmp/material_memo_render && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp/material_memo_render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx && pdfinfo /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | sed -n '1,24p' && pdftotext -layout /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf - | sed -n '1,220p'","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.9 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx as a Writer document -> /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export
Title:           Material Sourcing Recommendation Memo
Subject:         Certified aerospace door and hinge material sourcing plan
Author:          OpenAI Codex
Creator:         Writer
Producer:        LibreOffice 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
CreationDate:    Thu Aug 20 19:27:57 2026 UTC
Custom Metadata: no
Metadata Stream: yes
Tagged:          yes
UserProperties:  no
Suspects:        no
Form:            none
JavaScript:      no
Pages:           6
Encrypted:       no
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
Page rot:        0
File size:       238990 bytes
Optimized:       no
PDF v

    … 18,823 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  36. 36Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"pdftoppm -png -r 110 /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /tmp/material_memo_render/page >/dev/null 2>&1 && ls -lh /tmp/material_memo_render/page-*.png","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.8 seconds
Output:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 212K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-1.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 205K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-2.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 190K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-3.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 255K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-4.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 274K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-5.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 104K Aug 20 19:28 /tmp/material_memo_render/page-6.png
  37. 37exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst paths=["/tmp/material_memo_render/page-1.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-3.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-4.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-5.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-6.png"]; for (const pth of paths){ const r=await tools.view_image({path:pth,detail:"high"}); image(r.image_url); }1.4M chars

    Arguments

    const paths=["/tmp/material_memo_render/page-1.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-3.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-4.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-5.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/page-6.png"];
for (const pth of paths){ const r=await tools.view_image({path:pth,detail:"high"}); image(r.image_url); }

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

    … 1,409,776 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  38. 38exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_sourcing_memo.js\n@@\n function p(text, opts = {}) {\n return new Paragraph({\n@@\n- children: Array.isArray(text) ? text : [run(text, opts)],\n+ children: Array.isArray(text) ? text : (opts.heading ? [new TextRun({ text })] : [run(text, opts)]),\n@@\n- p(\"Method and source basis\", { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1 }),\n+ p(\"Method and source basis\", { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1, pageBreakBefore: true }),\n*** End Patch"; const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch); text(result

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_sourcing_memo.js\n@@\n function p(text, opts = {}) {\n   return new Paragraph({\n@@\n-    children: Array.isArray(text) ? text : [run(text, opts)],\n+    children: Array.isArray(text) ? text : (opts.heading ? [new TextRun({ text })] : [run(text, opts)]),\n@@\n-  p(\"Method and source basis\", { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1 }),\n+  p(\"Method and source basis\", { heading: HeadingLevel.HEADING_1, pageBreakBefore: true }),\n*** End Patch";
const result = await tools.apply_patch(patch);
text(result

    … 6 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  39. 39Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r1 = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"node build_material_sourcing_memo.js && python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r1.output);
const r2 = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp/material_memo_render /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx && pdfinfo /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sou

    … 158 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.5 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx

Paragraphs: 0 → 458 (+458)
All validations PASSED!

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx as a Writer document -> /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export
Overwriting: /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf
Pages:           6
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
  40. 40Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"pdftoppm -png -r 110 /tmp/material_memo_render/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /tmp/material_memo_render/newpage >/dev/null 2>&1","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":1000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.8 seconds
Output:
  41. 41exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst paths=["/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-1.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-5.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-6.png"]; for (const pth of paths){ const r=await tools.view_image({path:pth,detail:"high"}); image(r.image_url); }816k chars

    Arguments

    const paths=["/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-1.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-5.png","/tmp/material_memo_render/newpage-6.png"];
for (const pth of paths){ const r=await tools.view_image({path:pth,detail:"high"}); image(r.image_url); }

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

    … 815,436 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  42. 42Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"ls -lah /workspace/output && file /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx && sha256sum /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

total 160K
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4.0K Aug 20 19:27 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4.0K Aug 20 19:27 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 119K Aug 20 19:25 material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  25K Aug 20 19:28 material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
/bin/bash: line 1: file: command not found
  43. 43Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({"cmd":"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwb=load_workbook(p,data_only=True,read_only=True)\nqc=wb['Quote Candidates']\nselected=[]\nfor r in range(5,qc.max_row+1):\n    if qc.cell(r,17).value=='YES':\n        selected.append((qc.cell(r,1).value,qc.cell(r,2).value,qc.cell(r,15).value,qc.cell(r,16).value))\nprint('selected candidate rows',len(selected),'all packet feasible',all(x[2]=='YES' for x in selected),'all current no',all(x[3]=='NO' for x in selected))\nprint(

    … 690 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.3 seconds
Output:

selected candidate rows 15 all packet feasible True all current no True
current actionable quote pairs 2
LOT-5C9A16 yield 736 base PASS eligible — disposition DO NOT COUNT—exact-match demand exists only on programs that reject this melt origin
LOT-2B7E54 yield 214.6 base PASS eligible — disposition DO NOT COUNT—exact-match demand exists only on programs that reject this melt origin
LOT-B3E7C0 yield 979.4 base FAIL eligible — disposition EXCLUDE—open hold: Quality Hold - MRB
LOT-D6B821 yield 592.8 base FAIL eligible — disposition EXCLUDE—certificate C of C is below 3.1
LOT-1F9D63 yield 653.6 base FAIL eligible — disposition EXCLUDE—traceability Partial - heat not traceable; source status Suspended
LOT-4D1A95 yield 437.4 base FAIL eligible — disposition EXCLUDE—source status Conditional
1d3b479a32ff6e86e4607c09c8c98aa5b516a242857c9c2ff993f6229b296375  output/mate

    … 158 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  44. 44exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst p = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"Both deliverables are complete. The workbook recalculates with 2,193 formulas and zero errors; the memo passes DOCX validation and a six-page rendered visual review. Cross-checks confirm all selected packet-date quote pairs were compliant then, none is currently open, and all inventory allocations pass candidate and quantity gates.","plan":[{"step":"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"completed"},{"step":"Apply compliance gates, allocations,

    Arguments

    const p = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"Both deliverables are complete. The workbook recalculates with 2,193 formulas and zero errors; the memo passes DOCX validation and a six-page rendered visual review. Cross-checks confirm all selected packet-date quote pairs were compliant then, none is currently open, and all inventory allocations pass candidate and quantity gates.","plan":[{"step":"Inventory the source packet and extract all demand, lot, quote, approval, substitution, and schedule facts","status":"completed"},{"step":"Apply compliance gates, allocations,

    … 439 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  45. 45Completed and validated: - [Recommendation memo](/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx) - [Analys…

    Completed and validated:

    • Recommendation memo
    • Analysis workbook

    Key result: compliant inventory covers 5,857.25 of 8,960 lb. Fifteen requirements retain a 3,102.75 lb gap. All 12 preferred packet-date quotes are expired as of August 20, 2026, requiring revalidation or replacement. The workbook recalculates with zero formula errors.

3 failure modes across 5 verifier failures

  1. 1Required Evidence Fields or Rows OmittedView on Failure Modes ↗Deliverable Completion and Structure3 failures

    Description

    Is the decision generally present, but the required exact identifiers, comparison rows, operational columns, governing terms, before-and-after values, or validation fields needed to verify it are absent?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • The workbook avoids allocating China or Russia melt to the restricted programs but does not show the explicit origin-based rejection reason for those lots or quotes.

    • MOQ-driven buys show the residual need and the MOQ-adjusted order quantity across various sheets but never state the excess amount as its own value.

    • The workbook has no purchase-order sheet, ordered quantities, or committed cost to reconcile the residuals against.

  2. 2Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Deliverable Completion and Structure1 failure

    Description

    Must a reviewer join separate sheets or infer unstated links to connect an item or requirement with its inputs, alternatives, decision, rationale, quantities, and resulting economics?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.

  3. 3Escalation or Tradeoff Communication IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Presentation and Communication1 failure

    Description

    Does the final communication omit or conflate a required escalation, rejected attractive alternative, disqualifying reason, residual risk, or distinction between a feasible plan and separate process actions?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • The memo never cleanly pairs the required no-hard-sourcing-dead-end assertion with a separately listed set of quality or process escalations, either because a genuine shortfall remains unstated as such or because the two kinds of issue are conflated.