EKWbench
Switch benchEKWbench
Request dataset samplesby

task_111Manufacturing

16 verifiers · 15 core · 1 secondary · 16 LLM-graded

TaxonomyManufacturingBuyers and purchasing agents

All trialsGPT-5.6 SolcodexTrial 04

73%

Trial reward

GPT-5.6 SolFail

Trial 04 — 2nd of 4 by reward score. This model averages 74.5% across 4 trials on this task.

  • 11/15Core verifiers passed
  • 12/16All verifiers passed
  • 4Core failed
  • 47Turns
  • 34Tool calls
  • $4.38Cost
  • 38.2mTime
  • 74kOutput tokens

Missed 4 of 15 core — allocation_priority, traceability and cost_reconciliation and 1 more.

core (15)

  • usable_quantityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Coverage must be assessed on usable yield-adjusted quantity net of allocations, and the original attempt's central risk is treating gross or physically-present pounds as usable.

    How to pass

    Checks that the analysis workbook reports usable on-hand quantity using the formula (On Hand - Allocated) x Yield Factor for inventory lots rather than gross on-hand pounds.

    Reads

  • country_of_originLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Country-of-origin restrictions are binding contractual constraints, and the cheapest/fastest options for several critical lines are non-qualifying-origin material that must not be selected.

    How to pass

    Checks that material melted in China or Russia is excluded for the DFARS programs (Raven, Sable) and the CUST-EU programs (Meridian, Tundra) regardless of price or certificate quality.

    Reads

  • cert_traceabilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    EN 10204 3.1/3.2 certification and full traceability are minimum eligibility gates, and the original attempt risks accepting C-of-C or non-traceable material that is physically attractive.

    How to pass

    Checks that Certificate-of-Conformance-only lots/quotes and partial-traceability lots are excluded from certified-production coverage.

    Reads

  • source_hold_statusLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Approved-source status and hold status are hard eligibility gates, and otherwise-attractive USA-origin material from these sources must not be planned against requirements.

    How to pass

    Checks that sources in Suspended, Conditional, or Not Approved status, and material under an open quality/MRB or receiving-inspection hold, are excluded from new commitments.

    Reads

  • substitution_policyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The substitution policy is exhaustive and prohibits interchange (e.g., T651 vs T7351, /11 vs /12, bar vs plate vs extrusion), so a model must not silently treat near-match material as covering a callout.

    How to pass

    Checks that no alloy, temper/condition, product-form, or specification sub-spec substitution is applied beyond same-spec oversize/remnant cutdown.

    Reads

  • allocation_priorityLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Program-priority allocation is an explicit contention rule, and getting it wrong misassigns scarce compliant stock between competing programs.

    How to pass

    Checks that contested inventory lots usable by more than one requirement are allocated to the higher-priority (lower rank number) program first, with lower-priority shortfalls flowing to new purchase.

    Reads

    Failure mode Allocation or Selection Plan Incorrect

    Why it failed

    A contested inventory lot usable by two requirements is given to the lower-priority program while the higher-priority one is pushed to a new purchase.

    Justification

    Not all contested eligible lots are allocated highest-priority-first. In Inventory Usability, LOT-3A7C82 (6061 plate, 765.6 usable) is eligible for Meridian/ Halcyon/ Calder but allocates 726 to lower-priority Halcyon while higher-priority Meridian gets 0 from that lot; LOT-A1E9F4 likewise allocates 333 to lower-priority Calder while eligible higher-priority Meridian/Halcyon get 0. Although the 15-5PH 5862 and 4340 bar examples follow priority, these contested lot allocations violate the rubric.

  • lead_time_feasibilityLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Lead-time feasibility is an explicit gate, and the original attempt risks counting a compliant quote that docks on or after need-by as resolving a requirement on schedule.

    How to pass

    Checks that a supplier quote is treated as feasible only when its quoted dock/receipt date precedes the requirement need-by date.

    Reads

  • requirement_coverageLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level coverage classification is the core analytical output the task asks for and must be complete across all demand lines.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook classifies each of the 26 requirements into a coverage disposition (covered from compliant inventory, partial inventory plus buy, or full new purchase) at the requirement-ID level.

    Reads

  • traceabilityLLMFail
    Why it matters

    Requirement-level traceability is an explicit auditability obligation and is exactly where a weaker solution omits the why-rejected evidence chain.

    How to pass

    Checks that for each at-risk requirement the workbook records the selected inventory lot(s) with usable quantity, the rejected lots with reasons, the selected quote, the rejected quote alternatives with reasons, the residual after inventory, and the resulting purchase quantity and cost.

    Reads

    Failure mode Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or Incomplete

    Why it failed

    Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.

    Justification

    The workbook contains the audit pieces, but not the required single requirement-level view for at-risk lines. Requirement Plan/Allocation Detail show selected lots, applied PO and cost; Inventory Usability shows rejected lots with reasons; Quote Feasibility shows rejected/alternative quotes with reasons; PO Plan shows final order quantities/MOQ. For lines like REQ-H4A2, REQ-L8Q4, and REQ-E9C1, you must cross sheets to see rejected lots/quotes and the final PO quantity, so the required one-view per-requirement audit trail is not present.

  • residual_vs_moqLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Conflating need with MOQ-inflated buy quantity was a defect in the earlier attempt and obscures both true demand and committed spend.

    How to pass

    Checks that requirement residual quantity is reported separately from the minimum-order-quantity-adjusted purchase quantity, with the excess identified.

    Reads

  • cost_reconciliationLLMFail
    Why it matters

    A reconciled, self-consistent committed total was an explicit fix from the earlier attempt, where the memo and PO tab disagreed on the headline figure and shared lines risked double-charging.

    How to pass

    Checks that the workbook presents a single authoritative total committed new-buy cost with no conflicting totals and a cost chain that reconciles, with shared quote lines not double-counted.

    Reads

    Failure mode Decision Reconciliation or Conclusion Wrong

    Why it failed

    The workbook states two or more conflicting headline committed-buy totals even though each one's own detail rows reconcile internally.

    Justification

    The workbook shows two different headline PO-spend totals rather than one authoritative committed-buy total: Protect-all PO spend = $32,288.42 and Firm-baseline PO spend = $25,229.41 (also repeated in PO Plan). Program/requirement assigned PO costs roll to $32,288.42, not the firm-baseline total, so the committed-cost chain is not single and consistent across the workbook. The PO Plan line math itself reconciles and shared quotes are combined once (e.g., QTE-A3F91C 593.4 lb and QTE-3A9F18 680.8 lb), but the single-total criterion fails.

  • escalation_languageLLMPass
    Why it matters

    Clarifying escalation language so that 'every requirement has a feasible path' is not conflated with quality holds awaiting action was an explicit obligation from the earlier revision.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo states there is no hard sourcing dead-end while separately listing quality/MRB/process escalations.

    Reads

  • memo_recommendationLLMFail
    Why it matters

    The task's core decision principle is distinguishing usable material from merely cheap/fast/available material, and the memo is where that reasoning must be made legible to leadership.

    How to pass

    Checks that the memo recommends a sourcing/allocation plan that prioritizes compliance over lowest price or shortest lead time and explicitly identifies rejected cheaper/faster non-compliant options.

    Reads

    Failure mode Escalation or Tradeoff Communication Incomplete

    Why it failed

    The memo argues compliance over price or lead time but omits naming at least one of the three required attractive, cheaper, or faster non-compliant quotes along with the specific reason it was rejected.

    Justification

    The memo is compliance-led (e.g., "Compliance first" and "Commercial choice last") and it does reject lower-cost noncompliant options such as QTE-7D2B40 (China-origin 7075-T7351, unusable for Raven/Sable DFARS demand) and the $4.95/lb Tri-State 4340 bar quote (rejected because it offers only C of C). However, it does not explicitly document the required lowest-price Russia-melt 15-5PH quote (~$8.10/lb) with its material/price and unusability reason; references to Volga/Russia are not enough to satisfy that specific quote requirement.

  • no_fabrication_side_effectsLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The task forbids inventing options beyond the source packet, and penalizing fabricated content or unrequested side-additions protects against hallucinated uplift that would look like a stronger answer.

    How to pass

    Checks that the deliverables do not introduce fabricated alloys, tempers, substitutions, approvals, waivers, expedite options, or other material not present in the source files, and do not add materially unsolicited deliverables.

    Reads

  • residual_po_reconciliationLLMPass
    Why it matters

    The shared-PO double-counting failure mode (inflating the committed total by billing one quote line at each requirement's minimum) is exactly where the earlier attempt produced an unreconciled headline figure, and catching it is a fair, materially distinct core check.

    How to pass

    Checks that the sum of per-requirement residual purchase needs reconciles to the consolidated purchase-order quantities and committed cost, so shared quote lines are not double-counted across the requirements they serve.

    Reads

secondary (1)

  • memo_consistencyLLMPass
    Why it matters

    If the memo asserts headline counts or program restriction classes, they must be accurate and self-consistent; this guards against a confidently-stated but wrong summary rather than mandating an unprompted structure.

    How to pass

    Checks that any coverage counts or per-program restriction classes the memo chooses to state are internally consistent and correct, without forcing the memo to include specific counts.

    Reads

2 deliverables · what this trial produced

material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx121 KB

Executive Summary27 rows

Material Sourcing Review — Decision Dashboard
Packet basis: program status 2026-06-19 and inventory snapshot 2026-06-20. No post-packet change is assumed.
Decision snapshot
Requirements26Net demand (usable lb)8960Requirements with shortfall0
Inventory allocation (usable lb)5857.25Purchase applied (lb)3102.75Inventory-only requirements11
Protect-all PO quantity (lb)3621.5MOQ / excess quantity (lb)518.75Selected quote lines12
Protect-all PO spend32288.42Firm-baseline PO spend25229.41Tentative increment spend7059.01
Program allocation and cost ownership
ProgramRankNet DemandInventoryPurchase AppliedShortfallAssigned PO SpendDecision Status
PRG-RAVEN120271525.6501.405557.96COVERED
PRG-SABLE21218339.2878.808304.15COVERED — AT RISK
PRG-MERIDIAN316281252.7375.303012.51COVERED — PMO GATE
PRG-TUNDRA4130973957005813.55COVERED — PMO GATE
PRG-HALCYON516601201.5458.504295.05COVERED — PMO GATE
PRG-CALDER61118799.25318.7505305.2COVERED — PMO GATE
Leadership decisions and non-negotiable controls
1Reserve inventory nowLock the 5,857.25 usable-lb lot allocation in Allocation Detail. Existing allocations remain untouched; yield is not relaxed.
2Release firm baselineAuthorize $25,229.41 of firm-demand PO coverage before the listed quote expiries.
3Decide tentative coverageAuthorize or decline the $7,059.01 tentative increment; Sable REQ-L8Q4 requires immediate PMO/Quality escalation because the only compliant quote is two days early.
4Protect compliance barriersDo not use C of C, partial-trace, held, Conditional/Suspended/Not Approved, or origin-restricted candidates even when cheaper or physically present.
5Accept or challenge MOQ economicsProtect-all orders create 518.75 lb of excess, driven by Calder and Halcyon residuals. No undocumented yield or allocation change is used to erase it.
Workbook navigation
Requirement PlanOne row per MRP requirement; coverage, shortfall, assigned cost, risk, and action.
PO PlanSelected quote-line releases, MOQ effect, firm baseline, tentative increment, cost, and gates.
Allocation DetailLot/quote-to-requirement allocation with capacity, yield, compliance, timing, and cost checks.
Inventory UsabilityEvery exact-match lot/requirement pair and the reason it is eligible or excluded.
Quote FeasibilityEvery exact-match quote/requirement pair and its source, origin, cert, expiry, quantity, and timing tests.
Risks & Escalations / AlternativesRequired decisions, blocked material, and the documented alternatives considered.

User prompt → 47 turns · 34 tool calls → final responsecodex

  1. 1systemskills instructions · Skills A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of s…

    skills instructions

    Skills

    A skill is a set of instructions provided through a SKILL.md source. Below is the list of skills that can be used. Each entry includes a name, description, and source locator. file locators are on the host filesystem, executor package locators are owned by their execution environment, orchestrator package locators are opaque package identifiers, and custom resource locators use their provider's access mechanism.

    Available skills

    • imagegen: Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output should be a bitmap asset rather than repo-native code or vector. Do not use when the task is better handled by editing existing SVG/vector/code-native assets, extending an established icon or logo system, or building the visual directly in HTML/CSS/canvas. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/imagegen/SKILL.md)
    • openai-docs: Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex. (file: /tmp/codex-home/skills/.system/openai-docs/SKILL.md)
    • plugin-creator: Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required .codex-plugin/plugin.json, optional plugin folders/files, valid manifest defaults, and personal-marketplace entries by default. Use when Codex needs to create a new personal plugin, add optional plugin structure, generate or update marketplace entries for plugi

    … 3,403 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  2. 2systemYou are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals. At the start of your tur…

    You are /root, the primary agent in a team of agents collaborating to fulfill the user's goals.

    At the start of your turn, you are the active agent.
    You can spawn sub-agents to handle subtasks, and those sub-agents can spawn their own sub-agents.
    All agents in the team, including the agents that you can assign tasks to, are equally intelligent and capable, and have access to the same set of tools.

    You can use spawn_agent to create a new agent, followup_task to give an existing agent a new task and trigger a turn, and send_message to pass a message to a running agent without triggering a turn.
    Child agents can also spawn their own sub-agents.
    You can decide how much context you want to propagate to your sub-agents with the fork_turns parameter.

    You will receive messages in the analysis channel in the form:

    Message Type: MESSAGE | FINAL_ANSWER
Task name: <recipient>
Sender: <author>
Payload:
<payload text>

    They may be addressed as to=/root

    Note that collaboration tools cannot be called from inside functions.exec. Call spawn_agent, send_message, followup_task, wait_agent, interrupt_agent, and list_agents only as direct tool calls using the recipient shown in their tool definitions, such as to=functions.collaboration.spawn_agent, since they are intentionally absent from the functions.exec tools.* namespace. Available tools in functions.exec are explicitly described with a tools namespace in the developer message.

    All agents share the same directory. In detail:

    • All agents have access to the same container and filesystem as you.
    • All agents use the same current working directory.
    • As a result, edits made by one agent are immediately visible to all other agents.

    When calling wait_agent, prefer longer waits (minutes) to avoid busy polling.

    There are 4 available concurrency slots, meaning that up to 4 agents can be active at once, including you.

    Full-history forks (fork_turns omitted or "all") inherit the parent mod

    … 264 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  3. 3systemmulti agent mode · Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub…

    multi agent mode

    Any earlier instruction enabling proactive multi-agent delegation no longer applies. Do not spawn sub-agents unless the user or applicable AGENTS.md/skill instructions explicitly ask for sub-agents, delegation, or parallel agent work.

  4. 4userenvironment context · /workspace bash 2026-08-20 Etc/UTC /workspace

    environment context

    cwd
    /workspace
    shell
    bash
    current date
    2026-08-20
    timezone
    Etc/UTC
    root
    /workspace
  5. 5userYou are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hi…

    You are supporting a material sourcing review for an aerospace components manufacturer that builds certified door and hinge mechanism assemblies. Upcoming production lots require aluminum and steel raw materials, including plate, bar, extrusion, and machined-stock inputs. Several material requirements are at risk because available inventory, supplier quotes, lead times, certification status, source approvals, allocations, yield loss, and program priorities do not all align. Production and sourcing leadership need a sourcing plan that identifies which material lots can be used, which supplier quotes should be acted on, which requirements remain at risk, and which program commitments should be prioritized. The objective is not simply to buy the cheapest or fastest available material; the recommendation must distinguish physically available material from material that is actually usable for certified aerospace production. Using the attached material sourcing packet, determine the recommended sourcing and allocation plan for the current review cycle. Identify which aluminum and steel requirements can be covered from compliant on-hand inventory, which require new purchases, which supplier quotes are feasible, and which shortages or compliance issues require escalation. Evaluate the tradeoffs among material specification, temper or condition, product form, mill certification, traceability, approved-source status, country-of-origin or customer restrictions, available quantity after allocation, usable yield, lead time, cost, and program delivery impact. Work only from the attached materials: the material demand forecast, inventory lot and certification snapshot, approved material source list, supplier quote and lead-time matrix, engineering material substitution policy, and program priority / build schedule. Do not invent alternate alloys, tempers, substitutions, engineering approvals, customer waivers, supplier capacity, expedite options, certification corrections, yield a

    … 1,544 more characters in the raw trajectory.

  6. 6I’m using the spreadsheet and Word-document skills because the requested deliverables are an auditable analysis workbook…

    I’m using the spreadsheet and Word-document skills because the requested deliverables are an auditable analysis workbook and a leadership memo. I’ll first inventory the source packet and read the skill instructions, then reconcile demand, compliance, allocations, yield, quotes, and schedule before generating and validating both files.

  7. 7Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec22k chars

    Arguments

    const p = await tools.update_plan({plan:[
  {step:"Inspect source packet and read spreadsheet/document skill instructions","status":"in_progress"},
  {step:"Extract and reconcile demand, inventory, approvals, quotes, substitution rules, and priorities","status":"pending"},
  {step:"Build and validate the sourcing analysis workbook","status":"pending"},
  {step:"Draft and validate the recommendation memo","status":"pending"}
]});
const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"pwd && rg --files -g '!*output*' | sed -n '1,200p' && printf '\\n--- XLSX SKILL ---

    … 258 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

/workspace
data/supplier_quote_leadtime_matrix.xlsx
data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx
data/material_demand_forecast.xlsx
data/inventory_lot_cert_snapshot.xlsx
data/engineering_material_substitution_policy.pdf
data/approved_material_source_list.xlsx

--- XLSX SKILL ---
---
name: xlsx
description: "Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like \"the xlsx in my downloads\") — and wants something done to it or produced fr

    … 20,574 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  8. 8Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec12k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"printf '%s\\n' '--- XLSX SKILL CONTINUED ---' && sed -n '261,620p' /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/SKILL.md && printf '%s\\n' '--- DOCX SKILL CONTINUED ---' && sed -n '321,760p' /root/.agents/skills/docx/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

--- XLSX SKILL CONTINUED ---
  }
}
```

## Best Practices

### Library Selection
- **pandas**: Best for data analysis, bulk operations, and simple data export
- **openpyxl**: Best for complex formatting, formulas, and Excel-specific features

### Working with openpyxl
- Cell indices are 1-based (row=1, column=1 refers to cell A1)
- Use `data_only=True` to read calculated values: `load_workbook('file.xlsx', data_only=True)`
- **Warning**: If opened with `data_only=True` and saved, formulas are replaced with values and permanently lost
- For large files: Use `read_only=True` for reading or `write_only=True` for writing
- Formulas are preserved but not evaluated - use scripts/recalc.py to update values

### Working with pandas
- Specify data types to avoid inference issues: `pd.read_excel('file.xlsx', dtype={'id': str})`
- For large files, read s

    … 10,560 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  9. 9The packet also includes the engineering substitution policy as a PDF, so I’m adding the PDF skill to extract and verify…

    The packet also includes the engineering substitution policy as a PDF, so I’m adding the PDF skill to extract and verify that governing constraint before making any usability decision. This is important because a nominal material match cannot override an explicit substitution restriction.

  10. 10Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec8k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"sed -n '1,760p' /root/.agents/skills/pdf/SKILL.md","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":30000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

---
name: pdf
description: Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text/tables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting/decrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.
license: Proprietary. LICENSE.txt has complete terms
---

# PDF Processing Guide

## Overview

This guide covers essential PDF processing operations using Python libraries and command-line tools. For advanced features, JavaScript libraries, and detailed examples, see REFERENCE.md. If you need to fill out a PDF form, read FORMS.md and follow its instructions.

## Quick Start

```python
from pypdf im

    … 7,489 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  11. 11Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec38k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfor path in sorted(Path('/workspace/data').glob('*.xlsx')):\n    print(f'\\n===== {path.name} =====')\n    wb=load_workbook(path, data_only=False, read_only=False)\n    for ws in wb.worksheets:\n        print(f'--- SHEET {ws.title!r} rows={ws.max_row} cols={ws.max_column} merged={list(ws.merged_cells.ranges)} ---')\n        for row in ws.iter_rows():\n            vals=[c.value for c in row]\n            if any(v is not None for v in vals):\n

    … 823 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.1 seconds
Output:


===== approved_material_source_list.xlsx =====
--- SHEET 'Source List' rows=13 cols=9 merged=[] ---
1: 'Source ID' | 'Source Name' | 'Source Type' | 'Approved Spec Families' | 'Melt Country' | 'Origin Qualifying Status' | 'Approval Status' | 'Approval Expiry' | 'Note'
2: 'SRC-9F2A41' | 'Cascade Rolled Products LLC' | 'Mill' | 'AMS-QQ-A-250, AMS-QQ-A-200, AMS 4117' | 'USA' | 'Qualifying (USA)' | 'Approved' | '2027-03-31' | 'Aluminum plate/extrusion/bar'
3: 'SRC-3B7C19' | 'Ardenne Steelworks SA' | 'Mill' | 'AMS 5862, AMS 5659, AMS 5604' | 'France' | 'Qualifying (non-US)' | 'Approved' | '2026-12-31' | 'PH stainless; qualifying country (FR)'
4: 'SRC-D14E8B' | 'Tri-State Metals Distribution' | 'Distributor' | 'AMS-QQ-A-250, AMS-QQ-A-200, AMS 6415, AMS 6359' | 'USA' | 'Qualifying (USA)' | 'Approved'

    … 36,664 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  12. 12The packet is compact but deliberately adversarial: several lots and quotes look attractive until certification, source…

    The packet is compact but deliberately adversarial: several lots and quotes look attractive until certification, source status, origin, allocation, or yield is applied. I’ve extracted the governing policy and am now reading the program schedule—including priority and customer-origin rules—before assigning any shared compliant stock.

  13. 13Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom docx import Document\nfrom pathlib import Path\np=Path('/workspace/data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx')\nd=Document(p)\nprint('PARAGRAPHS')\nfor i,para in enumerate(d.paragraphs,1):\n    if para.text.strip():\n        print(f'P{i} [{para.style.name}]: {para.text}')\nprint('\\nTABLES')\nfor ti,t in enumerate(d.tables,1):\n    print(f'--- TABLE {ti} rows={len(t.rows)} cols={len(t.columns)} ---')\n    for ri,row in enumerate(t.rows,1):\n        print(f'{ri}: ' + ' | '.join(cell.text.replace('\\n',' /

    … 320 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.3 seconds
Output:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 8, in <module>
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name'
PARAGRAPHS
P1 [Heading 1]: Program Priority & Build Schedule
  14. 14Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec4k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom docx import Document\np='/workspace/data/program_priority_build_schedule.docx'\nd=Document(p)\nprint('PARAGRAPHS')\nfor i,para in enumerate(d.paragraphs,1):\n    if para.text.strip():\n        style = para.style.name if para.style is not None else '(none)'\n        print(f'P{i} [{style}]: {para.text}')\nprint('\\nTABLES')\nfor ti,t in enumerate(d.tables,1):\n    print(f'--- TABLE {ti} rows={len(t.rows)} cols={len(t.columns)} ---')\n    for ri,row in enumerate(t.rows,1):\n        print(f'{ri}: ' + ' | '.joi

    … 441 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.3 seconds
Output:

PARAGRAPHS
P1 [Heading 1]: Program Priority & Build Schedule
P2 [(none)]: 2026 Q3 Door/Hinge Mechanism Build Wave — Production Control Release PC-2026-0618
P3 [(none)]: Issued by: Production Control & Program Management Office (PMO).  Distribution: Sourcing, Materials Planning, Quality, MRB.  Status as of 2026-06-19.
P4 [(none)]: 1. Purpose
P5 [(none)]: This release fixes program priority ranking and committed build dates for the current review cycle. Where multiple programs compete for the same eligible material, allocation shall favor the higher-priority program (lower priority rank number). Contractual country-of-origin and specialty-metals restrictions stated in Section 3 are flowed from the customer contracts and are binding on sourcing decisions; they are not discretionary and may not be relaxed for cost or schedule convenience.
P6 [(none)]: 2. Program Prio

    … 3,497 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  15. 15Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nlines=[('A3F91C',593.4,9.4),('8B3F19',176,14.2),('3A9F18',680.8,11.75),('1A6E38',154.2,5.75),('2D7C64',236.1,7.6),('2F8C41',198,9.85),('6D1B84',287,6.9),('9A2E57',389,5.45),('9E4B27',250,8.7),('C1E7B4',250,8.9),('7E2A85',157,11.1),('D9F3B1',250,5.35)]\nfor q,x,p in lines: print(q,x,p,round(x*p,2))\nprint('qty',sum(x for _,x,_ in lines),'cost',round(sum(x*p for _,x,p in lines),2))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":2000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

A3F91C 593.4 9.4 5577.96
8B3F19 176 14.2 2499.2
3A9F18 680.8 11.75 7999.4
1A6E38 154.2 5.75 886.65
2D7C64 236.1 7.6 1794.36
2F8C41 198 9.85 1950.3
6D1B84 287 6.9 1980.3
9A2E57 389 5.45 2120.05
9E4B27 250 8.7 2175.0
C1E7B4 250 8.9 2225.0
7E2A85 157 11.1 1742.7
D9F3B1 250 5.35 1337.5
qty 3621.5 cost 32288.42
  16. 16Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nvals=[5577.96,2499.2,7999.4,1520,1950.3,2120.05,2225,1337.5]\nprint(sum(vals))\nprint(32288.42-sum(vals))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":1000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

25229.409999999996
7059.010000000002
  17. 17Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"command -v libreoffice || true\ncommand -v soffice || true\ncommand -v node || true\nnode -e \"try{console.log(require.resolve('docx'))}catch(e){console.log('docx module not found')}\"\nls -la /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts 2>/dev/null || true\nls -la /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office 2>/dev/null || true","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":5000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

/usr/bin/libreoffice
/usr/bin/soffice
/root/.nvm/versions/node/v22.23.2/bin/node
docx module not found
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 ..
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 office
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5782 Aug 20 23:54 recalc.py
total 44
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 helpers
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4991 Aug 20 23:54 pack.py
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 schemas
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5301 Aug 20 23:54 soffice.py
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4052 Aug 20 23:54 unpack.py
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3668 Aug 20 23:54 validate.py
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Aug 20 23:54 validators
  18. 18Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfor s in ['AMS-QQ-A-250/','AMS-QQ-A-200/']:\n print(s,len(s))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":1000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

AMS-QQ-A-250/ 13
AMS-QQ-A-200/ 13
  19. 19Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nvals=[736,592.8,979.4,214.6,212.5,664,653.6,588,437.4]\nprint(sum(vals))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":1000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

5078.299999999999
  20. 20exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst r = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"All six packet sources are extracted. The governing rules require exact alloy/spec/condition/form, 3.1/3.2 certification, full traceability, no holds, current approved-source status, program-specific origin compliance, yield-adjusted inventory, and priority-first allocation; no substitutions are invoked.","plan":[{"step":"Inspect source packet and read spreadsheet/document skill instructions","status":"completed"},{"step":"Extract and reconcile demand, inventory, approvals, quotes, substitution rules, and priorities","s

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"All six packet sources are extracted. The governing rules require exact alloy/spec/condition/form, 3.1/3.2 certification, full traceability, no holds, current approved-source status, program-specific origin compliance, yield-adjusted inventory, and priority-first allocation; no substitutions are invoked.","plan":[{"step":"Inspect source packet and read spreadsheet/document skill instructions","status":"completed"},{"step":"Extract and reconcile demand, inventory, approvals, quotes, substitution rules, and priorities","s

    … 209 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  21. 21userenvironment context · 2026-08-21 Etc/UTC /workspace

    environment context

    current date
    2026-08-21
    timezone
    Etc/UTC
    root
    /workspace
  22. 22The reconciliation is now complete on the packet’s stated 19–20 June 2026 review basis. The compliant plan covers all 26…

    The reconciliation is now complete on the packet’s stated 19–20 June 2026 review basis. The compliant plan covers all 26 requirements, but only by preserving priority-first inventory allocations and using 12 quote lines; several physically available lots are excluded for origin, certification, traceability, hold, or source-status failures. I’m building the workbook so each decision traces back to a lot/quote and recalculates from formulas.

  23. 23exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_workbook.py\n+from __future__ import annotations\n+\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+from datetime import date, datetime\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+from docx import Document\n+from openpyxl import Workbook, load_workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import CellIsRule, FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path(\"/workspace\")\n+DATA = ROOT /

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_workbook.py\n+from __future__ import annotations\n+\n+from collections import defaultdict\n+from datetime import date, datetime\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+from docx import Document\n+from openpyxl import Workbook, load_workbook\n+from openpyxl.comments import Comment\n+from openpyxl.formatting.rule import CellIsRule, FormulaRule\n+from openpyxl.styles import Alignment, Border, Font, PatternFill, Side\n+from openpyxl.utils import get_column_letter\n+\n+\n+ROOT = Path(\"/workspace\")\n+DATA = ROOT /

    … 73,519 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  24. 24Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python build_material_workbook.py","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output); if (r.exit_code) text(`EXIT ${r.exit_code}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.3 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
{'requirements': 26, 'inventory_applied': 5857.25, 'purchase_applied': 3102.75, 'selected_quotes': 12, 'protect_all_order_qty': 3621.4999999999995, 'protect_all_cost': 32288.42, 'firm_baseline_cost': 25229.41, 'tentative_increment_cost': 7059.01}
  25. 25Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python /root/.agents/skills/xlsx/scripts/recalc.py output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx 60","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":20000});
text(r.output); if (r.exit_code) text(`EXIT ${r.exit_code}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 7.1 seconds
Output:

status: success
total_errors: 0
error_summary: {}
total_formulas: 4733
  26. 26Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec2k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwb=load_workbook(p,data_only=True)\nprint('Sheets:',wb.sheetnames)\nws=wb['Requirement Plan']\nprint('Requirement rows',ws.max_row)\nfor r in range(5,31):\n    print(ws.cell(r,1).value, ws.cell(r,12).value, ws.cell(r,13).value, ws.cell(r,15).value, ws.cell(r,16).value, ws.cell(r,17).value)\nprint('shortfalls',sum((ws.cell(r,15).value or 0) for r in range(5,31)))\nwa=wb['Allocation Detail']\nprint('allocation failures',[wa.cell(

    … 1,145 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.6 seconds
Output:

Sheets: ['Executive Summary', 'Demand Source', 'Inventory Source', 'Quote Source', 'AMSL Source', 'Program Source', 'Policy Rules', 'Inventory Usability', 'Quote Feasibility', 'Allocation Detail', 'PO Plan', 'Requirement Plan', 'Risks & Escalations', 'Alternatives']
Requirement rows 30
REQ-H4A2 516.6 325.4 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 3058.76
REQ-K9P1 615 0 0 Covered — Inventory 0
REQ-C9T1 0 176 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 2499.2
REQ-X5M3 394 0 0 Covered — Inventory 0
REQ-T2C7 106.2 323.8 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 3804.65
REQ-B6N3 0 268 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 2519.2
REQ-F6B8 233 0 0 Covered — Inventory 0
REQ-L8Q4 0 287 0 Covered — PMO gate 1980.3
REQ-M1X8 512 0 0 Covered — Inventory 0
REQ-D7R4 323.9 23.1 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 175.56
REQ-W3F9 0 198 0 Covered — Inventory + PO 1950.3
REQ-R7W2 412 0 0 Covered — Inventory 0
REQ-G2J9 4.8 154.2 0 Covered

    … 1,450 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  27. 27The workbook now recalculates cleanly with 4,733 formulas and zero formula errors. It confirms 5,857.25 usable lb from c…

    The workbook now recalculates cleanly with 4,733 formulas and zero formula errors. It confirms 5,857.25 usable lb from compliant inventory, 3,102.75 lb applied from purchases, no residual mathematical shortfall, and $32,288.42 to protect all firm and tentative lines; $7,059.01 of that spend is gated by tentative demand. I’m moving to the leadership memo and will carry forward the quote-expiry and two-day Sable timing escalations explicitly.

  28. 28exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst r = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"The packet-basis allocation is reconciled and asserted: every requirement is exactly covered, every selected lot/quote passes the documented rules, no lot/quote capacity is exceeded, and priority-first allocation is preserved.","plan":[{"step":"Inspect source packet and read spreadsheet/document skill instructions","status":"completed"},{"step":"Extract and reconcile demand, inventory, approvals, quotes, substitution rules, and priorities","status":"completed"},{"step":"Build and validate the sourcing analysis wor

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"The packet-basis allocation is reconciled and asserted: every requirement is exactly covered, every selected lot/quote passes the documented rules, no lot/quote capacity is exceeded, and priority-first allocation is preserved.","plan":[{"step":"Inspect source packet and read spreadsheet/document skill instructions","status":"completed"},{"step":"Extract and reconcile demand, inventory, approvals, quotes, substitution rules, and priorities","status":"completed"},{"step":"Build and validate the sourcing analysis wor

    … 394 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 4.0 seconds
Output:


added 22 packages in 4s

1 package is looking for funding
  run `npm fund` for details
  29. 29exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_memo.js\n+const fs = require(\"fs\");\n+const {\n+ AlignmentType,\n+ BorderStyle,\n+ Document,\n+ Footer,\n+ Header,\n+ HeadingLevel,\n+ LevelFormat,\n+ PageNumber,\n+ Packer,\n+ Paragraph,\n+ ShadingType,\n+ TabStopPosition,\n+ TabStopType,\n+ Table,\n+ TableCell,\n+ TableLayoutType,\n+ TableRow,\n+ TextRun,\n+ VerticalAlign,\n+ WidthType,\n+} = require(\"/tmp/material-docx/node_modules/docx\");\n+\n+const OUTPUT = \"/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: build_material_memo.js\n+const fs = require(\"fs\");\n+const {\n+  AlignmentType,\n+  BorderStyle,\n+  Document,\n+  Footer,\n+  Header,\n+  HeadingLevel,\n+  LevelFormat,\n+  PageNumber,\n+  Packer,\n+  Paragraph,\n+  ShadingType,\n+  TabStopPosition,\n+  TabStopType,\n+  Table,\n+  TableCell,\n+  TableLayoutType,\n+  TableRow,\n+  TextRun,\n+  VerticalAlign,\n+  WidthType,\n+} = require(\"/tmp/material-docx/node_modules/docx\");\n+\n+const OUTPUT = \"/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation

    … 33,315 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  30. 30Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"node build_material_memo.js","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output); if (r.exit_code) text(`EXIT ${r.exit_code}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.4 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
  31. 31Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output); if (r.exit_code) text(`EXIT ${r.exit_code}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.9 seconds
Output:


Paragraphs: 0 → 437 (+437)
All validations PASSED!
  32. 32Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"rm -f /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx\npdfinfo /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | sed -n '1,30p'\npdftotext -layout /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt\nwc -l /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt\nsed -n '1,220p' /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt","workdir":"/workspace","yie

    … 114 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script failed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

Script error:
exec_command failed for `/bin/bash -lc "rm -f /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf
python /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
pdfinfo /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf | sed -n '1,30p'
pdftotext -layout /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt
wc -l /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt
sed -n '1,220p' /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt"`: CreateProcess { message: "Rejected(\"`/bin/bash -lc \\\"rm -f /tmp/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir /tmp output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx\\npdfinfo /tmp/material_sourcing_recommenda

    … 363 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  33. 33Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec20k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"review_dir=$(mktemp -d /tmp/material-memo-review.XXXXXX)\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir \"$review_dir\" output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx\npdfinfo \"$review_dir/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\" | sed -n '1,30p'\npdftotext -layout \"$review_dir/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\" \"$review_dir/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt\"\nwc -l \"$review_dir/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt\"\nsed -n '1,240p' \

    … 247 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.7 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx as a Writer document -> /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf using filter : writer_pdf_Export
Author:          Un-named
Creator:         Writer
Producer:        LibreOffice 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
CreationDate:    Fri Aug 21 00:08:00 2026 UTC
Custom Metadata: no
Metadata Stream: yes
Tagged:          yes
UserProperties:  no
Suspects:        no
Form:            none
JavaScript:      no
Pages:           6
Encrypted:       no
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
Page rot:        0
File size:       231587 bytes
Optimized:       no
PDF version:     1.7
365 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.txt
MATERIAL SOURCING REVIEW

    … 19,295 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  34. 34Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"pdftoppm -png -r 120 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page >/dev/null 2>&1\nls -lh /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-*.png","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":3000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.2 seconds
Output:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 287K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-1.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 135K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-2.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 327K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-3.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 276K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-4.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 232K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-5.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 290K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-6.png
  35. 35exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst imgs = [1,3,4,5,6]; for (const n of imgs) { const r = await tools.view_image({path:`/tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-${n}.png`,detail:"original"}); text(`PAGE ${n}`); image(r.image_url); }1.9M chars

    Arguments

    const imgs = [1,3,4,5,6];
for (const n of imgs) {
  const r = await tools.view_image({path:`/tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-${n}.png`,detail:"original"});
  text(`PAGE ${n}`);
  image(r.image_url);
}

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

PAGE 1

    … 1,925,238 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  36. 36exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst r = await tools.view_image({path:"/tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-2.png",detail:"original"}); image(r.image_url);184k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.view_image({path:"/tmp/material-memo-review.apdivY/page-2.png",detail:"original"}); image(r.image_url);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

    … 182,652 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  37. 37exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_memo.js\n@@\n- [500, 1400, 1150, 1150, 1150, 1250, 3624],\n+ [650, 1350, 1150, 1150, 1150, 1250, 3524],\n@@\n- [700, 1700, 4824, 1800, 1200],\n+ [900, 1650, 4674, 1800, 1200],\n*** End Patch"; text(await tools.apply_patch(patch));

    Arguments

    const patch = "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: build_material_memo.js\n@@\n-  [500, 1400, 1150, 1150, 1150, 1250, 3624],\n+  [650, 1350, 1150, 1150, 1150, 1250, 3524],\n@@\n-  [700, 1700, 4824, 1800, 1200],\n+  [900, 1650, 4674, 1800, 1200],\n*** End Patch";
text(await tools.apply_patch(patch));

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

{}
  38. 38Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"node build_material_memo.js\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/validate.py output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":10000});
text(r.output); if (r.exit_code) text(`EXIT ${r.exit_code}`);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 2.1 seconds
Output:

/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx

Paragraphs: 0 → 437 (+437)
All validations PASSED!
  39. 39Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec1k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"book_review_dir=$(mktemp -d /tmp/material-book-review.XXXXXX)\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir \"$book_review_dir\" output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx\npdfinfo \"$book_review_dir/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf\" | sed -n '1,30p'\npdftoppm -f 1 -l 1 -png -r 120 \"$book_review_dir/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf\" \"$book_review_dir/page\" >/dev/null 2>&1\nls -lh \"$book_review_dir\"\nprintf '%s\\n' \"$book_review_dir\""

    … 146 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 3.1 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
convert /workspace/output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx as a Calc document -> /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf using filter : calc_pdf_Export
Title:           Material Sourcing Analysis Workbook
Subject:         2026 Q3 certified door/hinge material sourcing review
Author:          Codex
Creator:         Calc
Producer:        LibreOffice 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
CreationDate:    Fri Aug 21 00:08:37 2026 UTC
Custom Metadata: no
Metadata Stream: yes
Tagged:          yes
UserProperties:  no
Suspects:        no
Form:            none
JavaScript:      no
Pages:           14
Encrypted:       no
Page size:       792 x 612 pts (letter)
Page rot:        0
File size:       1924250 bytes
Optimized:       no
PDF version:     1.

    … 188 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  40. 40exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execconst r = await tools.view_image({path:"/tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/page-01.png",detail:"original"}); image(r.image_url);241k chars

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.view_image({path:"/tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/page-01.png",detail:"original"}); image(r.image_url);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:

    … 240,040 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  41. 41Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"pdftoppm -f 10 -l 13 -png -r 120 /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.pdf /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail >/dev/null 2>&1\nls -lh /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-*.png","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":30000,"max_output_tokens":3000});
text(r.output);

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.7 seconds
Output:

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 153K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-10.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  62K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-11.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 101K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-12.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  75K Aug 21 00:08 /tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-13.png
  42. 42exec1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    execfor (const n of [10,11,12,13]) { const r=await tools.view_image({path:`/tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-${n}.png`,detail:"original"}); text(`PAGE ${n}`); image(r.image_url); }532k chars

    Arguments

    for (const n of [10,11,12,13]) {
  const r=await tools.view_image({path:`/tmp/material-book-review.fgurEI/detail-${n}.png`,detail:"original"});
  text(`PAGE ${n}`);
  image(r.image_url);
}

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:

PAGE 10

    … 531,414 more characters of output in the raw trajectory.

  43. 43Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"memo_review2=$(mktemp -d /tmp/material-memo-final.XXXXXX)\npython /root/.agents/skills/docx/scripts/office/soffice.py --headless --convert-to pdf --outdir \"$memo_review2\" output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx >/dev/null\npdfinfo \"$memo_review2/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\" | rg '^(Pages|Page size|File size)'\npdftotext \"$memo_review2/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.pdf\" - | rg -n 'Ran k|AMBE R|#REF!|#VALUE!|#NAME\\?|#DIV/0!' || true\nprintf '%s\\n' \"$memo_review2\"","workdir":"

    … 131 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.3 seconds
Output:

Warning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
Pages:           6
Page size:       612 x 792 pts (letter)
File size:       231586 bytes
/tmp/material-memo-final.5UzcDL
  44. 44Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"ls -lh output\nunzip -t output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx | tail -n 2\nunzip -t output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx | tail -n 2\npython - <<'PY'\nfrom openpyxl import load_workbook\np='output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx'\nwbv=load_workbook(p,data_only=True,read_only=True)\nchecks={\n 'requirements': wbv['Executive Summary']['B5'].value,\n 'net_demand': wbv['Executive Summary']['E5'].value,\n 'shortfall_count': wbv['Executive Summary']['H5'].value,\n 'inventory_applied': wbv['Executive Summar

    … 834 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 1.0 seconds
Output:

total 148K
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 121K Aug 21 00:04 material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  23K Aug 21 00:08 material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx
/bin/bash: line 2: unzip: command not found
/bin/bash: line 3: unzip: command not found
{'requirements': 26, 'net_demand': 8960, 'shortfall_count': 0, 'inventory_applied': 5857.25, 'purchase_applied': 3102.75, 'protect_all_po_qty': 3621.5, 'excess_qty': 518.75, 'protect_all_cost': 32288.42, 'firm_baseline_cost': 25229.41, 'tentative_increment_cost': 7059.01}
  45. 45Both deliverables are complete and cross-checked. The workbook has zero formula errors and no negative lot/quote capacit…

    Both deliverables are complete and cross-checked. The workbook has zero formula errors and no negative lot/quote capacity; the memo passes document validation and renders cleanly as a six-page US Letter document. The final recommendation is explicitly packet-dated so no expired quote, later inventory change, or undocumented status update is silently assumed.

  46. 46Shell1

    Tool execution only — no assistant text

    Shellvia exec

    Arguments

    const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:"python - <<'PY'\nfrom zipfile import ZipFile\nfor p in ['output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx','output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx']:\n    with ZipFile(p) as z:\n        bad=z.testzip()\n        print(p, 'ZIP_OK' if bad is None else f'BAD:{bad}', len(z.namelist()))\nPY","workdir":"/workspace","yield_time_ms":10000,"max_output_tokens":2000});
const p = await tools.update_plan({explanation:"Both requested files are generated, formula/document validated, rendered for visual inspection, and reconciled to

    … 518 more characters of arguments in the raw trajectory.

    Output

    Script completed
Wall time 0.2 seconds
Output:

output/material_sourcing_analysis_workbook.xlsx ZIP_OK 58
output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx ZIP_OK 24

{}
  47. 47Completed both deliverables: - [Recommendation memo](/workspace/output/material_sourcing_recommendation_memo.docx) - [An…

    Completed both deliverables:

    • Recommendation memo
    • Analysis workbook

    Packet-basis plan covers all 26 requirements with 5,857.25 lb compliant inventory and 12 selected quote lines. Protect-all PO spend is $32,288.42; the key escalation is Sable’s two-day receipt margin. Quote validity must be revalidated after listed expiries.

4 failure modes across 4 verifier failures

  1. 1Allocation or Selection Plan IncorrectView on Failure Modes ↗Reasoning and Computation1 failure

    Description

    After eligibility is established, does the artifact assign a scarce resource, facing, shelf position, assortment item, or appointment slot to the wrong recipient or produce the wrong required final set?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • A contested inventory lot usable by two requirements is given to the lower-priority program while the higher-priority one is pushed to a new purchase.

  2. 2Decision Reconciliation or Conclusion WrongView on Failure Modes ↗Reasoning and Computation1 failure

    Description

    Do detailed rows support one result while another table, summary, recommendation, or action classification asserts a materially conflicting result?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • The workbook states two or more conflicting headline committed-buy totals even though each one's own detail rows reconcile internally.

  3. 3Decision Audit Trail Fragmented or IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Deliverable Completion and Structure1 failure

    Description

    Must a reviewer join separate sheets or infer unstated links to connect an item or requirement with its inputs, alternatives, decision, rationale, quantities, and resulting economics?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • Selected lots, rejected alternatives, selected and rejected quotes, and purchase cost for an at-risk requirement each live on a different sheet instead of one joined view.

  4. 4Escalation or Tradeoff Communication IncompleteView on Failure Modes ↗Presentation and Communication1 failure

    Description

    Does the final communication omit or conflate a required escalation, rejected attractive alternative, disqualifying reason, residual risk, or distinction between a feasible plan and separate process actions?

    Failure evidence · per affected verifier

    • The memo argues compliance over price or lead time but omits naming at least one of the three required attractive, cheaper, or faster non-compliant quotes along with the specific reason it was rejected.